Saha Shumit, Ghahjaverestan Nasim Montazeri, Yadollahi Azadeh
Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Applied Computational Sciences, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Queens University, London, ON, Canada.
Sleep Med. 2025 Jul;131:106485. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106485. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
Sleep apnea diagnosis relies on polysomnography (PSG), which is resource-intensive and requires manual analysis to differentiate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from central sleep apnea (CSA). Existing portable devices, while valuable in detecting sleep apnea, often do not distinguish between the two types of apnea. Such differentiation is critical because OSA and CSA have distinct underlying causes and treatment approaches. This study addresses this gap by leveraging tracheal breathing sounds as a non-invasive and cost-effective method to classify central and obstructive events. We employed a transfer learning strategy on six pre-trained deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including Alexnet, Resnet18, Resnet50, Densenet161, VGG16, and VGG19. These networks were fine-tuned using spectrograms of tracheal sound signals recorded during PSG. The dataset, comprising 50 participants with a combination of central and obstructive events, was used to train and validate the model. Results showed high accuracy in differentiating central from obstructive respiratory events, with the combined CNN architecture achieving an overall accuracy of 83.66 % and a sensitivity and specificity above 83 %. The findings suggest that tracheal breathing sounds can effectively distinguish between OSA and CSA, providing a less invasive and more accessible alternative to traditional PSG. This methodology could be implemented in portable devices to enhance the diagnosis of sleep apnea, enabling targeted treatment. By facilitating earlier and more accurate diagnoses, this method supports personalized treatment strategies, optimizing therapy selection (e.g., CPAP for OSA, ASV for CSA) and ultimately enhancing clinical outcomes.
睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断依赖于多导睡眠图(PSG),这需要大量资源,并且需要人工分析来区分阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)和中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(CSA)。现有的便携式设备虽然在检测睡眠呼吸暂停方面很有价值,但往往无法区分这两种类型的呼吸暂停。这种区分至关重要,因为OSA和CSA有不同的潜在病因和治疗方法。本研究通过利用气管呼吸音作为一种非侵入性且经济高效的方法来对中枢性和阻塞性事件进行分类,解决了这一差距。我们在六个预训练的深度卷积神经网络(CNN)上采用了迁移学习策略,包括Alexnet、Resnet18、Resnet50、Densenet161、VGG16和VGG19。这些网络使用在PSG期间记录的气管声音信号的频谱图进行微调。该数据集由50名患有中枢性和阻塞性事件的参与者组成,用于训练和验证模型。结果显示在区分中枢性和阻塞性呼吸事件方面具有很高的准确性,组合的CNN架构实现了83.66%的总体准确率以及高于83%的敏感性和特异性。研究结果表明,气管呼吸音可以有效区分OSA和CSA为传统PSG提供了一种侵入性较小且更易获得的替代方法。这种方法可以在便携式设备中实施,以加强睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断,实现有针对性的治疗。通过促进更早、更准确的诊断,这种方法支持个性化治疗策略,优化治疗选择(例如,OSA使用持续气道正压通气,CSA使用适应性伺服通气),最终改善临床结果。