Suppr超能文献

脂质体布比卡因与布比卡因用于正中开胸心脏手术的胸骨旁浅表肋间平面阻滞的比较

Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine in Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.

作者信息

Qiu Rong-En, Lan Yun-Ping, Liu Shan, Fang Xiang-Yu, Zhang Yun-Feng

机构信息

Anesthesiology Department, Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People' s Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;31(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00008.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (Lip-BPVC) versus standard bupivacaine (BPVC) for superficial parasternal intercostal plane block in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via median sternotomy.

METHODS

A total of 82 adult patients were randomly assigned to the BPVC group (n = 41) or the Lip-BPVC group (n = 41).

RESULTS

The Lip-BPVC group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at all postinjection time points compared to the BPVC group with fewer opioid analgesics. Lip-BPVC demonstrated an initial heightened inflammatory response postoperatively compared to standard BPVC, indicated by significantly lower levels of pro-inflammatory markers at 24 and 48 hours postinjection with BPVC. However, by 72 hours, inflammatory markers did not differ significantly between Lip-BPVC and BPVC groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of surgery duration, extubation time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

Lip-BPVC initially increased inflammatory markers postoperatively, but levels were comparable to BPVC by 72 hours. It provided superior pain control and reduced opioid use compared to standard BPVC in CABG patients, with similar safety and recovery outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较脂质体布比卡因(Lip-BPVC)与标准布比卡因(BPVC)在接受择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)并经正中胸骨切开术的患者中进行胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞时的疗效和安全性。

方法

总共82例成年患者被随机分配至BPVC组(n = 41)或Lip-BPVC组(n = 41)。

结果

与BPVC组相比,Lip-BPVC组在所有注射后时间点的疼痛评分均显著更低,且使用的阿片类镇痛药更少。与标准BPVC相比,Lip-BPVC术后初期表现出更强的炎症反应,表现为注射BPVC后24小时和48小时促炎标志物水平显著更低。然而,到72小时时,Lip-BPVC组和BPVC组之间的炎症标志物无显著差异。两组在手术时长、拔管时间、重症监护病房和住院时间,或术后恶心呕吐发生率方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

Lip-BPVC术后初期炎症标志物增加,但到72小时时水平与BPVC相当。在CABG患者中,与标准BPVC相比,它提供了更好的疼痛控制并减少了阿片类药物的使用,且安全性和恢复结果相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b8/11972696/783305d0a6b6/atcs-31-1-25-00008-figure01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验