Kario Kazuomi, Ohbayashi Hiroyuki, Hashimoto Masami, Itabashi Naoki, Kato Mitsutoshi, Uchiyama Kazuaki, Hirano Kunio, Nakamura Noriko, Miyamoto Takahide, Nagashima Hirotaka, Ishida Hidenori, Ebe Yusuke, Hatta Tsuguru, Fukui Toshiki, Katsuya Tomohiro, Shimosawa Tatsuo, Taguchi Takashi, Tanabe Ayumi, Ohishi Mitsuru
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Tohno Chuo Clinic, Mizunami, Gifu, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2025 Apr;48(4):1586-1598. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-02078-8. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
This predefined subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to determine whether the comparative efficacy and safety of esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide differs with age. Patients were divided into two age subgroups (<65 and ≥65 years). The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was assessed based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) changes. Esaxerenone was considered non-inferior if this value was <3.9/ < 2.1 mmHg; if it was <0 mmHg, esaxerenone was considered superior in its BP-lowering effect. The results showed that the least squares mean changes in morning home SBP/DBP from baseline to the end of treatment (primary endpoint) were -9.5/-5.7 with esaxerenone and -8.2/-4.9 mmHg with trichloromethiazide (between-group difference: -1.3 [95% CI, -3.3, 0.8]/-0.8 [ - 2.1, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged <65 years. These changes were -14.6/-7.2 and -11.5/-6.7 (-3.0 [-4.9, -1.2]/-0.5 [-1.5, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged ≥65 years. The incidences of serum potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L were 2.2% and 1.9% in the esaxerenone-treated subgroups aged <65 and ≥65 years, respectively. In conclusion, esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged <65 years, esaxerenone achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering both SBP and DBP. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone was superior to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP and achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering DBP. The impact of esaxerenone on serum potassium levels did not show a specific age-related effect. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to age (<65 and ≥65 years) showed that esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone achieved the superiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP.
这项对多中心、随机、开放标签、平行组EXCITE-HT研究的预定义亚组分析旨在确定依沙氯尼和三氯噻嗪的疗效和安全性对比是否因年龄而异。患者被分为两个年龄亚组(<65岁和≥65岁)。基于收缩压/舒张压(SBP/DBP)变化差异的双侧95%置信区间(CI)上限评估依沙氯尼相对于三氯噻嗪的非劣效性。如果该值<3.9/<2.1 mmHg,则认为依沙氯尼非劣效;如果<0 mmHg,则认为依沙氯尼在降压效果上更优。结果显示,在<65岁亚组中,从基线到治疗结束时(主要终点),依沙氯尼组家庭清晨SBP/DBP的最小二乘均值变化为-9.5/-5.7 mmHg,三氯噻嗪组为-8.2/-4.9 mmHg(组间差异:-1.3 [95% CI,-3.3,0.8]/-0.8 [-2.1,0.5] mmHg)。在≥65岁亚组中,这些变化分别为-14.6/-7.2 mmHg和-11.5/-6.7 mmHg(-3.0 [-4.9,-1.2]/-0.5 [-1.5,0.5] mmHg)。在依沙氯尼治疗的<65岁和≥65岁亚组中,血清钾水平≥5.5 mEq/L的发生率分别为2.2%和1.9%。总之,无论年龄如何,依沙氯尼在降压效果上均达到了相对于三氯噻嗪预先定义的非劣效界值。在<65岁的患者中,依沙氯尼在降低SBP和DBP方面均达到了相对于三氯噻嗪的非劣效界值。在≥65岁的患者中,依沙氯尼在降低SBP方面优于三氯噻嗪,在降低DBP方面达到了相对于三氯噻嗪的非劣效界值。依沙氯尼对血清钾水平的影响未显示出特定的年龄相关效应。根据年龄(<65岁和≥65岁)对EXCITE-HT研究进行的亚组分析表明,无论年龄如何,依沙氯尼在降压效果上均达到了相对于三氯噻嗪预先定义的非劣效界值。在≥65岁的患者中,依沙氯尼在降低SBP方面达到了相对于三氯噻嗪的优效界值。