O'Connor R J, Visscher Marty O, Narendran Vivek, Wang Y, Wiesemann F, Carr A N
The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Pediatr Dermatol. 2025 May-Jun;42(3):532-538. doi: 10.1111/pde.15944. Epub 2025 Apr 6.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Skin is a baby's first line of defense against mechanical, chemical, enzymatic, and microbial insults. Preventive interventions in the diapered area are important given repetitive, episodic exposures to irritants in urine and feces. For over a century, physicians have utilized petrolatum-based emollients (PBE) prophylactically and retroactively for skin irritation in the diapered area. In this study, a diaper containing an anhydrous, shea butter-based emollient (SBE) was evaluated for its skin effects on adult and baby skin.
A 6-week, randomized, crossover, on-baby study was conducted to compare diapered skin erythema from PBE-, SBE-, or non-emollient-containing diapers. Quantification of emollient transfer from diaper to baby was also determined, and two adult forearm studies evaluated emollient effects to lessen irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or prevent skin overhydration.
Babies who transitioned from the PBE-containing diaper to the no emollient diaper exhibited a significant increase in skin erythema, whereas no increase was observed for those transitioning from the PBE to the SBE diaper. Babies wearing the SBE diaper were 2.6x more likely to be free of erythema (score = 0) at the perianal site versus the non-emollient diaper, whereas the proportion of erythema-free babies was similar between PBE and SBE diapers, consistent with their similar protection of skin in the adult forearm models.
Collectively, these studies demonstrate a disposable diaper containing an emollient protects diapered skin versus diapers without emollients. SBE was as effective in mitigating erythema, was well-tolerated, and provided similar protection as the PBE in a diaper context.
背景/目的:皮肤是婴儿抵御机械、化学、酶和微生物侵害的第一道防线。鉴于尿布区域反复、间歇性接触尿液和粪便中的刺激物,该区域的预防性干预措施很重要。一个多世纪以来,医生一直预防性地和追溯性地使用凡士林基润肤剂(PBE)来治疗尿布区域的皮肤刺激。在本研究中,对一种含有无水乳木果油基润肤剂(SBE)的尿布进行了评估,以观察其对成人和婴儿皮肤的影响。
进行了一项为期6周的随机交叉婴儿研究,比较使用含PBE、SBE或不含润肤剂尿布时尿布覆盖区域皮肤的红斑情况。还测定了润肤剂从尿布转移到婴儿身上的量,并且两项成人前臂研究评估了润肤剂减轻月桂醇硫酸酯钠(SLS)引起的刺激或防止皮肤过度水合的效果。
从含PBE尿布过渡到不含润肤剂尿布的婴儿,皮肤红斑显著增加,而从PBE尿布过渡到SBE尿布的婴儿则未观察到红斑增加。与不含润肤剂的尿布相比,使用SBE尿布的婴儿肛周部位无红斑(红斑评分为0)的可能性高2.6倍,而PBE和SBE尿布无红斑婴儿的比例相似,这与它们在成人前臂模型中对皮肤的保护作用相似一致。
总体而言,这些研究表明,含有润肤剂的一次性尿布比不含润肤剂的尿布更能保护尿布覆盖区域的皮肤。在尿布环境中,SBE在减轻红斑方面同样有效,耐受性良好,并且与PBE提供相似的保护作用。