Adil Nurkhaledatul Falah Bin Nuzma, Murthy Jaya Kumar, Mohamed Isa Bin Naina, Jamil Teh Rohaila Binti, Mohamed Rashidi Mohamed Bin Pakri
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Apr 4;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/200071. eCollection 2025.
Smoking has become a leading preventable cause of premature death and morbidity worldwide, with 8 million people dying each year because of tobacco. In Malaysia, a 24-week standard smoking cessation program is available to help smokers. Teleconsultation was introduced into this program during the COVID-19 pandemic by using internet-based video counseling to reduce the number of clinic visits. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of hybrid virtual consultation for smoking cessation programs among patients with nicotine dependence.
A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted where all the active smokers registered in the smoking cessation program from 2018 to 2023 were recruited. They were grouped into face-to-face interventions and hybrid virtual consultations. All data were obtained from the smoking cessation program registry. The primary outcome was point abstinence (PA) at week 7 (1-month post-quit date), biochemically verified with carbon monoxide (CO) Smokerlyzer for both face-to-face and hybrid groups.
A total of 156 participants were included in this study, including face-to-face (99 participants) and hybrid virtual consultation (57 participants). The mean age of face-to-face and hybrid group participants was 51 and 48 years, respectively. In general, hybrid virtual consultation was more feasible, as evidenced by a lower defaulter rate and a higher rate of participants graduating at the end of the program than face-to-face consultation. The effectiveness of smoking cessation was also higher in hybrid consultation, with a higher abstinence rate at weeks 4 and 7, with percentages of 42.1% and 56.1%, respectively. Additionally, the hybrid group maintained a high continuous abstinence rate (CAR) from week 7 to 24, with a percentage of 56.1%.
Hybrid virtual consultation was more effective, as evidenced by higher smoking cessation at week 7 (1-month post-quit date) and CAR from week 7 to week 24 compared to the face-to-face group. Telemedicine or teleconsultation should be easily available for smoking cessation programs, and healthcare providers should consider incorporating hybrid models into them to fully utilize the program and improve outcomes.
吸烟已成为全球可预防的过早死亡和发病的主要原因,每年有800万人死于烟草相关疾病。在马来西亚,有一个为期24周的标准戒烟项目来帮助吸烟者。在新冠疫情期间,通过基于互联网的视频咨询引入远程会诊,以减少门诊就诊次数。本研究旨在评估尼古丁依赖患者戒烟项目的混合虚拟会诊效果。
进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,招募了2018年至2023年在戒烟项目中登记的所有现吸烟者。他们被分为面对面干预组和混合虚拟会诊组。所有数据均从戒烟项目登记处获取。主要结局是第7周(戒烟日期后1个月)的点戒烟率(PA),通过一氧化碳(CO)烟碱分析仪对面对面组和混合组进行生化验证。
本研究共纳入156名参与者,包括面对面组(99名参与者)和混合虚拟会诊组(57名参与者)。面对面组和混合组参与者的平均年龄分别为51岁和48岁。总体而言,混合虚拟会诊更可行,这体现在违约率较低,且项目结束时毕业参与者的比例高于面对面会诊。混合会诊的戒烟效果也更高,在第4周和第7周的戒烟率更高,分别为42.1%和56.1%。此外,混合组从第7周到第24周保持了较高的持续戒烟率(CAR),为56.1%。
与面对面组相比,混合虚拟会诊更有效,这体现在第7周(戒烟日期后1个月)的戒烟率更高,以及从第7周到第24周的持续戒烟率更高。远程医疗或远程会诊应方便用于戒烟项目,医疗保健提供者应考虑将混合模式纳入其中,以充分利用该项目并改善效果。