Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Old Government Building, 55 Lambton Quay, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand.
Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, 23 Mein Street, Newtown, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 13;21(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01336-1.
During the first COVID-19 pandemic 'lockdown' in Aotearoa/New Zealand (March-May 2020, in which strict 'stay at home' measures were introduced), general practices were advised to use telephone and video consultations (telehealth) wherever possible instead of the usual in-person visits. This was a sudden change for most practices and patients. This research aimed to explore how patients accessed general practice during lockdown and evaluate their experiences with telehealth, to inform how telehealth could be most effectively used in the future.
Using a mixed-method approach, we undertook an online survey and in-depth interviews with adults (> 18 years) who had contact with practices during lockdown, recruited through social media and email lists. We present descriptive statistics from the survey data (n = 1010) and qualitative analysis of interview data (n = 38) and open-ended survey questions, using a framework of access to health care, from the patient's perspective.
In general, patients reported high satisfaction with telehealth in general practice during lockdown. Telehealth was convenient and allowed patients to safely access health care without having to weigh-up the fear of COVID-19 infection against the need to be seen. Telehealth worked best for routine and familiar health issues and when rapport was established between patients and clinicians. This was easier with a pre-existing clinical relationship, but not impossible without one. Telehealth was less suitable when a physical examination was needed, when the diagnosis was unknown or for patients who had a strong preference to be seen in-person.
Even in this disruptive lockdown period, that prompted an unexpected and rapid implementation of telehealth services in general practices, most patients had positive experiences with telehealth. In the future, patients want the choice of consultation type to match their needs, circumstances, and preferences. Technological issues and funding barriers may need to be addressed, and clear communication for both patients and clinicians is needed about key aspects of telehealth (e.g. cost, appropriateness, privacy). Maintaining telehealth as an option post-lockdown has the potential to increase timely and safe access to primary health care for many patients.
在新西兰(2020 年 3 月至 5 月,实行严格的“居家”措施)的第一次 COVID-19 大流行“封锁”期间,建议全科医生尽可能使用电话和视频咨询(远程医疗)代替通常的面对面就诊。这对大多数医生和患者来说都是一个突然的改变。本研究旨在探讨患者在封锁期间如何获得全科医生的服务,并评估他们对远程医疗的体验,以为未来如何最有效地使用远程医疗提供信息。
我们采用混合方法,通过社交媒体和电子邮件列表招募在封锁期间与医生有过接触的成年人(>18 岁),进行了在线调查和深入访谈。我们从调查数据(n=1010)和访谈数据(n=38)以及开放式调查问题中呈现描述性统计数据,使用从患者角度看待的医疗保健获取框架进行定性分析。
总的来说,患者报告在封锁期间对全科医生的远程医疗非常满意。远程医疗方便,使患者能够安全地获得医疗保健,而不必权衡对 COVID-19 感染的恐惧与需要就诊的需求。当患者和临床医生之间建立了融洽的关系时,远程医疗对常规和熟悉的健康问题最有效。如果有预先存在的临床关系,这会更容易,但没有也并非不可能。当需要进行体格检查、诊断不明或患者强烈希望亲自就诊时,远程医疗不太适合。
即使在这个具有破坏性的封锁时期,促使全科医生突然和迅速实施远程医疗服务,大多数患者对远程医疗有积极的体验。在未来,患者希望根据自己的需求、情况和偏好选择咨询类型。可能需要解决技术问题和资金障碍,并且需要为患者和临床医生提供有关远程医疗的关键方面(例如,成本、适当性、隐私)的清晰沟通。在封锁后保持远程医疗作为一种选择,有可能为许多患者增加及时和安全获得初级卫生保健的机会。