Stowell H
Int J Neurosci. 1985 May;26(3-4):219-24. doi: 10.3109/00207458508985618.
An evoked potential report by four authors has revived the question of the somatosensory specificity of the vertex potential of somatosensory evoked potentials, when these are derived by scalp conductance in response to subjectively painful skin stimulation. By a peripheral nerve-block maneuver combined with subjective sensoriperceptual reports, the authors show a late, slow positive wave in the somatosensory evoked potential whose appearance and disappearance are claimed to reflect the brain's response to a uniquely C-fiber input and to a combination of A delta and C-fiber input respectively. But their idiosyncratic interpretation of their data has merely revived an unresolved question: How much, if anything, of these familiar "ultralate," slow positivities can be ascribed to any form of neural encoding of nociception, as distinct from a nonspecific brain response to a behaviorally important stimulus?
四位作者的一篇诱发电位报告重新引发了一个问题,即体感诱发电位的顶点电位的体感特异性问题,当这些电位是通过头皮电导对主观疼痛的皮肤刺激做出反应而得出时。通过外周神经阻滞操作并结合主观感觉知觉报告,作者们在体感诱发电位中显示出一个晚期、缓慢的正波,其出现和消失据称分别反映了大脑对独特的C纤维输入以及Aδ纤维和C纤维输入组合的反应。但他们对数据的独特解释只是重新引发了一个尚未解决的问题:这些常见的“超晚期”缓慢正波,如果有的话,有多少可归因于任何形式的伤害性感受神经编码,而不是大脑对行为上重要刺激的非特异性反应?