评估一种新型护理干预措施对慢性骨科伤口患者负压封闭引流治疗效果的影响。
Evaluation of the effect of a novel nursing intervention in the treatment of vacuum sealing drainage in patients with chronic orthopedic wounds.
作者信息
Chen Lan, Li Dong, Lei Xiaodong, Zhou Bixia, Chen Lili
机构信息
Department of Orthopedics, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
出版信息
Afr Health Sci. 2024 Dec;24(4):99-105. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i4.13.
BACKGROUND
To explore the application effect of "4+1" nursing intervention in the treatment of chronic orthopaedic trauma with negative pressure vacuum sealing drainage.
METHODOLOGY
Patients before the implementation of the "4+1 nursing intervention" program were selected as the control group (60 cases). 60 patients after the implementation of the "4+1 nursing intervention" program were selected as the research group. Control group was given routine care. Research group adopted the "4+1" nursing intervention. Hamilton Depression score, wound healing time, pain visual analogue scale, treatment compliance, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
After the intervention, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression scores in the study group were lower than those in the control group; visual analogue scale on the 3rd and 5th days after the study were lower than those in the control group, and the wound healing time was shorter than that in the control group. The treatment compliance rate and nursing satisfaction of the study group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
The application of "4 + 1" nursing intervention in treatment of orthopaedic chronic wounds has a good effect.
背景
探讨“4+1”护理干预在负压封闭引流治疗慢性骨科创伤中的应用效果。
方法
选取实施“4+1”护理干预方案前的患者作为对照组（60例）。选取实施“4+1”护理干预方案后的60例患者作为研究组。对照组给予常规护理。研究组采用“4+1”护理干预。比较两组患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分、伤口愈合时间、疼痛视觉模拟评分、治疗依从性、自评焦虑量表评分及护理满意度。
结果
干预后，研究组的自评焦虑量表评分和汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分低于对照组；研究组术后第3天和第5天的视觉模拟评分低于对照组，且伤口愈合时间短于对照组。研究组的治疗依从率和护理满意度高于对照组（P<0.05）。
结论
“4+1”护理干预应用于骨科慢性伤口治疗效果良好。
Zotero 插件