Suppr超能文献

迷走神经刺激对戊四氮麻醉大鼠心率、呼吸频率的影响及其对癫痫易感性的作用。

The effect of vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate and respiration rate and their impact on seizure susceptibility in anaesthetized rats under pentylenetetrazol.

作者信息

Chávez Cerda Javier, Acedo Reina Elena, Dereli Ayse S, Vande Perre Louis, Raffoul Romain, Verstraeten Maxime, Ngan Yamb Michel-Antony, Germany Morrison Enrique, Collard Elise, Apaire Auriane, Doguet Pascal, Garnier Jérôme, Delbeke Jean, El Tahry Riëm, Nonclercq Antoine

机构信息

Bio-, Electro-and Mechanical-Systems (BEAMS), Université Libre de Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Institute of Neurosciences (IoNS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2025 Mar 21;19:1487082. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1487082. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Despite the proven efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in seizure control, its precise mechanism of action remains unclear. VNS is known to impact the cardiorespiratory system. In this study, we explored the effects of standard and breathing-synchronized VNS on heart and respiratory rates in anesthetized epileptic rats, as well as their impact on seizure susceptibility. Seizures were induced in rats by intravenous pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) infusion. Three animal groups ( = 4) were subjected to different types of stimulation: Sham VNS, Standard VNS, and Breathing-Synchronized VNS. Measurements included respiration, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and vagal electroneurogram. Each experiment began with a 5-min baseline period, followed by PTZ infusion until tonic-clonic seizure onset, confirmed by video recording and electroencephalogram. Results indicate that the stimulation significantly decreased the heart rate below baseline levels for standard VNS (-120.0 ± 69.1 bpm) and breathing-synchronized VNS (-84.9 ± 61.0 bpm), overcoming the heart rate increasing effect of PTZ infusion observed in the sham VNS (+79.2 ± 35.5 bpm), and there was no recovery during OFF periods. Regarding the breathing rate changes, the sham VNS group presented a slight increase with respect to baseline (+13.6 ± 1.8 bpm). The stimulation slightly increased the average breathing rate for standard VNS (+13.0 ± 14.6 bpm) and breathing-synchronized VNS (+13.7 ± 10.4 bpm), however with significantly enlarged standard deviation. More specifically, the breathing rate presented a pattern that suggests that the rats experienced respiratory hypoxia under stimulation. The VNS modulation of the heart rate and breathing rate in the standard VNS group was similar in the breathing-synchronized VNS, suggesting that the VNS effect is cumulative. Unexpectedly, the sham VNS group required a higher PTZ dose (79.7 ± 13.4 mg/kg) to reach tonic-clonic seizures compared to the standard VNS group (57.9 ± 9.8 mg/kg), and the breathing-synchronized VNS group (60.0 ± 8.7 mg/kg), pointing to an increased seizure susceptibility of VNS in this particular model. Additionally, the latency of the seizures was longer in the sham VNS (291.5 ± 84.4 s) compared to standard VNS (200.5 ± 59.5 s) and breathing-synchronized VNS (206.9 ± 66.0 s), meaning that the seizures under stimulation were starting earlier. A significant linear relationship was found between heart rate and respiratory rate changes, and seizure susceptibility ( = 0.62, -value = 0.012). We hypothesize that the significant drop in heart rate and the presence of altered respiration patterns, such as apneas or changes in breathing rates, caused by VNS, are related to hypoxia and hypotension conditions, which could increase susceptibility to PTZ. Future investigations with larger sample sizes, incorporating blood pressure and oxygen saturation monitoring, are needed to sort out the role of hypoxia and hypotension as potential covariates affecting the seizure susceptibility caused by overstimulation. Such a finding would support the idea that VNS safety and efficacy require precise adjustments.

摘要

尽管迷走神经刺激(VNS)在控制癫痫发作方面的疗效已得到证实,但其确切作用机制仍不清楚。已知VNS会影响心肺系统。在本研究中,我们探讨了标准VNS和呼吸同步VNS对麻醉的癫痫大鼠心率和呼吸频率的影响,以及它们对癫痫易感性的影响。通过静脉注射戊四氮(PTZ)诱导大鼠癫痫发作。将三组动物(每组n = 4)进行不同类型的刺激:假VNS、标准VNS和呼吸同步VNS。测量指标包括呼吸、心电图、脑电图和迷走神经电图。每个实验开始时先有5分钟的基线期,然后注射PTZ直至强直阵挛性癫痫发作开始,通过视频记录和脑电图确认。结果表明,对于标准VNS(-120.0±69.1次/分钟)和呼吸同步VNS(-84.9±61.0次/分钟),刺激显著降低心率至基线水平以下,克服了假VNS中观察到的PTZ注射引起的心率增加效应(+79.2±35.5次/分钟),并且在刺激停止期间没有恢复。关于呼吸频率变化,假VNS组相对于基线有轻微增加(+13.6±1.8次/分钟)。刺激使标准VNS(+13.0±14.6次/分钟)和呼吸同步VNS(+13.7±10.4次/分钟)的平均呼吸频率略有增加,但标准差显著增大。更具体地说,呼吸频率呈现出一种模式,表明大鼠在刺激下经历了呼吸性缺氧。标准VNS组中VNS对心率和呼吸频率的调节在呼吸同步VNS中相似,表明VNS效应是累积的。出乎意料的是,与标准VNS组(57.9±9.8毫克/千克)和呼吸同步VNS组(60.0±8.7毫克/千克)相比,假VNS组达到强直阵挛性癫痫发作需要更高的PTZ剂量(79.7±13.4毫克/千克),这表明在这个特定模型中VNS会增加癫痫易感性。此外,与标准VNS(200.5±59.5秒)和呼吸同步VNS(206.9±66.0秒)相比,假VNS组癫痫发作的潜伏期更长(291.5±84.4秒),这意味着刺激下的癫痫发作开始得更早。发现心率和呼吸频率变化与癫痫易感性之间存在显著的线性关系(r = 0.62,p值 = 0.012)。我们假设,VNS引起的心率显著下降以及呼吸模式的改变,如呼吸暂停或呼吸频率变化,与缺氧和低血压状况有关,这可能会增加对PTZ的易感性。未来需要进行更大样本量的研究,纳入血压和血氧饱和度监测,以厘清缺氧和低血压作为影响过度刺激引起的癫痫易感性的潜在协变量的作用。这样的发现将支持VNS的安全性和有效性需要精确调整的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8a/11968678/576d6ea0f0ef/fnins-19-1487082-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验