Freund Dani R, Bump Joseph K
Department of Environment and Life Sciences, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 3;13:e19080. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19080. eCollection 2025.
Although the commercial demand for North American beaver () hair shaped much of the socio-ecological landscape of North America, use of beaver hair in wildlife research has focused on the Eurasian beaver () and collection methods have largely involved handling animals alive or sampling dead animals. In 2022 and 2023, we tested the utility of barbed-wire hair snares to non-invasively collect hair from beavers around ponds in Northern Minnesota. At 56 different beaver ponds, we deployed 64 hair snares with remote cameras. From these data, we determined the efficiency of hair snares to collect samples, from what side of the body samples are collected, the weight and dirtiness of samples collected, the potential for bycatch, and if snares impede beavers' ability to travel on land. We collected beaver hair samples from 94% of snares deployed, with snares sampling beaver legs and back most often. Forty-two percent of samples collected had no dirt on them, and the most productive snare collected on average 3.4 mg of clean hair per day. Muskrats were the second most sampled animal, but only made up on average 16% of total samples recorded on video per snare. Snares inhibited beaver travel in 0.1% of videos ( = 5,627 videos of beavers recorded, = 6 videos where beaver travel was inhibited). We did not find any predictive variable that influenced the collection of beaver hair (, location of snare at pond, presence of wire brushes on snare, number of times beavers touched snares, or location on the beaver's body that was sampled). Our study provides in depth evidence of passive hair snare methods used to collect North American beaver hair, and serves as a guide to non-invasive hair snaring for multiple objectives such as hormone, genetic, and stable-isotope sample collection.
尽管北美海狸的毛发在商业上的需求塑造了北美大部分的社会生态景观,但野生动物研究中对海狸毛发的使用主要集中在欧亚海狸上,且采集方法大多涉及活体处理动物或对死动物进行采样。在2022年和2023年,我们测试了带刺铁丝网毛发陷阱在明尼苏达州北部池塘周围从海狸身上非侵入性采集毛发的效用。在56个不同的海狸池塘,我们部署了64个带有远程摄像头的毛发陷阱。根据这些数据,我们确定了毛发陷阱采集样本的效率、从身体的哪一侧采集样本、所采集样本的重量和脏污程度、误捕的可能性,以及陷阱是否会妨碍海狸在陆地上行走的能力。我们从94%的已部署陷阱中采集到了海狸毛发样本,陷阱最常采集到海狸腿部和背部的毛发。42%的采集样本没有污垢,最有效的陷阱平均每天采集到3.4毫克干净毛发。麝鼠是第二大被采样的动物,但平均仅占每个陷阱视频记录的总样本的16%。在0.1%的视频中(共记录了5627个海狸视频,其中6个视频中海狸的行动受到了阻碍)陷阱妨碍了海狸的行动。我们没有发现任何影响海狸毛发采集的预测变量(例如,陷阱在池塘中的位置、陷阱上是否有钢丝刷、海狸接触陷阱的次数,或采样的海狸身体部位)。我们的研究为用于采集北美海狸毛发的被动毛发陷阱方法提供了深入证据,并可作为用于多种目标(如激素、基因和稳定同位素样本采集)的非侵入性毛发陷阱采集的指南。