• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫样活动和癫痫发作风险遵循长期非线性吸引子动力学。

Epileptiform Activity and Seizure Risk Follow Long-Term Non-Linear Attractor Dynamics.

作者信息

Rosch Richard E, Scheid Brittany, Davis Kathryn A, Litt Brian, Ashourvan Arian

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RT, UK.

出版信息

Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Jun;12(23):e2411829. doi: 10.1002/advs.202411829. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1002/advs.202411829
PMID:40192017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12199362/
Abstract

Many biological systems display circadian and slow multi-day rhythms, such as hormonal and cardiac cycles. In patients with epilepsy, these cycles also manifest as slow cyclical fluctuations in seizure propensity. However, such fluctuations in symptoms are consequences of the complex interactions between the underlying physiological, pathophysiological, and external causes. Therefore, identifying an accurate model of the underlying system that governs the multi-day rhythms allows for a more reliable seizure risk forecast and targeted interventions. The primary aim is to develop a personalized strategy for inferring long-term trajectories of epileptiform activity and, consequently, seizure risk for individual patients undergoing long-term ECoG sampling via implantable neurostimulation devices. To achieve this goal, the Hankel alternative view of Koopman (HAVOK) analysis is adopted to approximate a linear representation of nonlinear seizure propensity dynamics. The HAVOK framework leverages Koopman theory and delay-embedding to decompose chaotic dynamics into a linear system of leading delay-embedded coordinates driven by the low-energy coordinate (i.e., forcing). The findings reveal the topology of attractors underlying multi-day seizure cycles, showing that seizures tend to occur in regions of the manifold with strongly nonlinear dynamics. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the identified system driven by forcings with short periods up to a few days accurately predicts patients' slower multi-day rhythms, which improves seizure risk forecasting.

摘要

许多生物系统呈现出昼夜节律和持续数天的缓慢节律,如激素和心脏周期。在癫痫患者中,这些周期也表现为癫痫发作倾向的缓慢周期性波动。然而,症状的这种波动是潜在生理、病理生理和外部原因之间复杂相互作用的结果。因此,识别出控制多日节律的潜在系统的准确模型,有助于进行更可靠的癫痫发作风险预测和有针对性的干预。主要目标是制定一种个性化策略,用于推断癫痫样活动的长期轨迹,进而推断通过植入式神经刺激装置进行长期皮层脑电图(ECoG)采样的个体患者的癫痫发作风险。为实现这一目标,采用了基于柯普曼算子的汉克尔替代视图(HAVOK)分析来近似非线性癫痫发作倾向动力学的线性表示。HAVOK框架利用柯普曼理论和延迟嵌入,将混沌动力学分解为由低能量坐标(即强迫)驱动的领先延迟嵌入坐标的线性系统。研究结果揭示了多日癫痫发作周期背后吸引子的拓扑结构,表明癫痫发作倾向于发生在具有强非线性动力学的流形区域。此外,研究表明,由周期短至几天的强迫驱动的已识别系统能够准确预测患者较慢的多日节律,从而改善癫痫发作风险预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/c1cb13076dbc/ADVS-12-2411829-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/47639ea9b48b/ADVS-12-2411829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/84686f692a61/ADVS-12-2411829-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/0773ac402711/ADVS-12-2411829-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/c1cb13076dbc/ADVS-12-2411829-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/47639ea9b48b/ADVS-12-2411829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/84686f692a61/ADVS-12-2411829-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/0773ac402711/ADVS-12-2411829-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b90/12199362/c1cb13076dbc/ADVS-12-2411829-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Epileptiform Activity and Seizure Risk Follow Long-Term Non-Linear Attractor Dynamics.癫痫样活动和癫痫发作风险遵循长期非线性吸引子动力学。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Jun;12(23):e2411829. doi: 10.1002/advs.202411829. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英钠单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.
3
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯巴比妥单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:一项个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD001904. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001904.pub3.
4
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;11(11):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub3.
5
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.
6
Yoga for epilepsy.用于癫痫治疗的瑜伽
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 5;10(10):CD001524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001524.pub3.
7
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.
8
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
9
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.托吡酯与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 6;12(12):CD012065. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012065.pub2.
10
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
State-dependent effects of responsive neurostimulation depend on seizure localization.反应性神经刺激的状态依赖性效应取决于癫痫发作的定位。
Brain. 2025 Feb 3;148(2):521-532. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae240.
2
Resting-state background features demonstrate multidien cycles in long-term EEG device recordings.静息态背景特征显示长期 EEG 设备记录中的多日周期。
Brain Stimul. 2023 Nov-Dec;16(6):1709-1718. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
The Influence of Light Wavelength on Human HPA Axis Rhythms: A Systematic Review.光波长对人类下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴节律的影响:一项系统综述。
Life (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;13(10):1968. doi: 10.3390/life13101968.
4
Closed-loop stimulation in periods with less epileptiform activity drives improved epilepsy outcomes.在癫痫样活动较少的时期进行闭环刺激可改善癫痫治疗效果。
Brain. 2024 Feb 1;147(2):521-531. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad343.
5
Seizure occurrence is linked to multiday cycles in diverse physiological signals.发作的发生与多种生理信号的多日周期有关。
Epilepsia. 2023 Jun;64(6):1627-1639. doi: 10.1111/epi.17607. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
6
Seizure forecasting: Where do we stand?癫痫预测:我们处于什么位置?
Epilepsia. 2023 Dec;64 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S62-S71. doi: 10.1111/epi.17546. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
7
Detecting temporal lobe seizures in ultra long-term subcutaneous EEG using algorithm-based data reduction.基于算法的数据缩减检测超长程皮下 EEG 的颞叶癫痫发作。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Oct;142:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.07.504. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
8
Thalamic deep brain stimulation modulates cycles of seizure risk in epilepsy.丘脑深部脑刺激调节癫痫发作风险的周期。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 20;11(1):24250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03555-7.
9
Human multidien rhythms: Commentary for: "Multiday cycles of heart rate are associated with seizure likelihood: An observational cohort study".人类多日节律:对《心率的多日周期与癫痫发作可能性相关:一项观察性队列研究》的评论
EBioMedicine. 2021 Dec;74:103698. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103698. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
Multiday cycles of heart rate are associated with seizure likelihood: An observational cohort study.多日心率周期与癫痫发作的可能性相关:一项观察性队列研究。
EBioMedicine. 2021 Oct;72:103619. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103619. Epub 2021 Oct 11.