• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Closed-loop stimulation in periods with less epileptiform activity drives improved epilepsy outcomes.在癫痫样活动较少的时期进行闭环刺激可改善癫痫治疗效果。
Brain. 2024 Feb 1;147(2):521-531. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad343.
2
Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Epilepsy.响应性神经刺激治疗癫痫
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019 Apr;30(2):231-242. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Anterior nucleus of the thalamus deep brain stimulation vs temporal lobe responsive neurostimulation for temporal lobe epilepsy.丘脑前核深部脑刺激与颞叶反应性神经刺激治疗颞叶癫痫的比较。
Epilepsia. 2022 Sep;63(9):2290-2300. doi: 10.1111/epi.17331. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
4
The Impact of Responsive Neurostimulation on the Treatment of Epilepsy.反应性神经刺激对癫痫治疗的影响。
Neurol India. 2020 Nov-Dec;68(Supplement):S278-S281. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.302468.
5
Circadian changes in aperiodic activity are correlated with seizure reduction in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy treated with responsive neurostimulation.周期性活动的昼夜节律变化与接受反应性神经刺激治疗的内侧颞叶癫痫患者的癫痫发作减少相关。
Epilepsia. 2024 May;65(5):1360-1373. doi: 10.1111/epi.17938. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Distinct Biomarkers of ANT Stimulation and Seizure Freedom in an Epilepsy Patient with Ambulatory Hippocampal Electrocorticography.癫痫患者动态海马脑电监测下抗癫痫药物刺激和无癫痫发作的生物标志物明显不同。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2023;101(6):349-358. doi: 10.1159/000533680. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
7
Invasive neuromodulation for epilepsy: Comparison of multiple approaches from a single center.癫痫的侵袭性神经调节:来自单一中心的多种方法比较。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Dec;137(Pt A):108951. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108951. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
8
Association of Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation Neurophysiological Features With Seizure Control Among Patients With Focal Epilepsy.闭环脑刺激神经生理学特征与局灶性癫痫患者癫痫控制的关联。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):800-808. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0658.
9
Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable seizures arising from eloquent and other neocortical areas.脑区反应性神经刺激术治疗语言区及其他新皮层区致药物难治性癫痫
Epilepsia. 2017 Jun;58(6):1005-1014. doi: 10.1111/epi.13739. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation.反应性神经刺激治疗癫痫调节效果的状态依赖性证据。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):366-375. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Care: Advancements in Bone Care and Future Directions.将人工智能整合到骨科护理中:骨护理的进展与未来方向。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 13;12(5):513. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050513.
2
Inter-seizure variability in thalamic recruitment and its implications for precision thalamic neuromodulation.丘脑募集的发作间期变异性及其对精准丘脑神经调节的影响。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 22;5(1):190. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00920-9.
3
Interictal network dysfunction and cognitive impairment in epilepsy.癫痫发作间期的网络功能障碍与认知损害
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1038/s41583-025-00924-3.
4
Epileptiform Activity and Seizure Risk Follow Long-Term Non-Linear Attractor Dynamics.癫痫样活动和癫痫发作风险遵循长期非线性吸引子动力学。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Jun;12(23):e2411829. doi: 10.1002/advs.202411829. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
5
Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian nucleus for drug-resistant epilepsy in children: Quality-of-life and functional outcomes from the CHILD-DBS registry.儿童药物难治性癫痫的丘脑中央中核深部脑刺激:CHILD-DBS注册研究的生活质量和功能结局
Epilepsia. 2025 Jul;66(7):2225-2238. doi: 10.1111/epi.18393. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
6
Recent applications of EEG-based brain-computer-interface in the medical field.基于脑电图的脑机接口在医学领域的最新应用。
Mil Med Res. 2025 Mar 24;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00598-z.
7
DynamoSort: Using machine learning approaches for the automatic classification of seizure dynamotypes.DynamoSort:使用机器学习方法对癫痫发作动态类型进行自动分类。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 17:2025.02.12.637999. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.12.637999.
8
Evaluating the accuracy of monitoring seizure cycles with seizure diaries.通过癫痫发作日记评估癫痫发作周期监测的准确性。
Epilepsia. 2025 May;66(5):1585-1598. doi: 10.1111/epi.18309. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
9
Can brain network analyses guide epilepsy surgery?脑网络分析能否指导癫痫手术?
Curr Opin Neurol. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):105-110. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001346. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
10
Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome: an etiologic study of 361 patients with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.婴儿痉挛症综合征:361例婴儿痉挛症综合征患者的病因学研究
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 9;12:1522079. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1522079. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic intracranial recordings after resection for epilepsy reveal a "running down" of epileptiform activity.癫痫切除术后的慢性颅内记录显示癫痫样活动“逐渐减弱”。
Epilepsia. 2023 Jul;64(7):e135-e142. doi: 10.1111/epi.17645. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
The Interictal Suppression Hypothesis in focal epilepsy: network-level supporting evidence.局灶性癫痫的发作间期抑制假说:网络层面的支持证据。
Brain. 2023 Jul 3;146(7):2828-2845. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad016.
3
Embedded Human Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.嵌入式人体闭环深度脑刺激治疗抽动秽语综合征:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):1064-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2741.
4
Temporal lobe interictal spikes disrupt encoding and retrieval of verbal memory: A subregion analysis.颞叶癫痫间期棘波干扰言语记忆的编码和提取:亚区分析。
Epilepsia. 2022 Sep;63(9):2325-2337. doi: 10.1111/epi.17334. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Anterior nucleus of the thalamus deep brain stimulation vs temporal lobe responsive neurostimulation for temporal lobe epilepsy.丘脑前核深部脑刺激与颞叶反应性神经刺激治疗颞叶癫痫的比较。
Epilepsia. 2022 Sep;63(9):2290-2300. doi: 10.1111/epi.17331. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Patient-specific structural connectivity informs outcomes of responsive neurostimulation for temporal lobe epilepsy.个体患者结构连接可预测颞叶癫痫反应性神经刺激的结果。
Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):2037-2055. doi: 10.1111/epi.17298. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
7
Deep brain stimulation targets in epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of anterior and centromedian thalamic nuclei and hippocampus.癫痫的脑深部刺激靶点:丘脑前核、中央中核及海马的系统评价与荟萃分析
Epilepsia. 2022 Mar;63(3):513-524. doi: 10.1111/epi.17157. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
8
Thalamic deep brain stimulation modulates cycles of seizure risk in epilepsy.丘脑深部脑刺激调节癫痫发作风险的周期。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 20;11(1):24250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03555-7.
9
Long-term brain network reorganization predicts responsive neurostimulation outcomes for focal epilepsy.长期脑网络重组预测局灶性癫痫的反应性神经刺激治疗效果。
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Aug 25;13(608). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abf6588.
10
Effects of hippocampal interictal discharge timing, duration, and spatial extent on list learning.海马间期放电的时间、持续时间和空间范围对列表学习的影响。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Oct;123:108209. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108209. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

在癫痫样活动较少的时期进行闭环刺激可改善癫痫治疗效果。

Closed-loop stimulation in periods with less epileptiform activity drives improved epilepsy outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

Brain. 2024 Feb 1;147(2):521-531. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad343.

DOI:10.1093/brain/awad343
PMID:37796038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10834245/
Abstract

In patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, electrical stimulation of the brain in response to epileptiform activity can make seizures less frequent and debilitating. This therapy, known as closed-loop responsive neurostimulation (RNS), aims to directly halt seizure activity via targeted stimulation of a burgeoning seizure. Rather than immediately stopping seizures as they start, many RNS implants produce slower, long-lasting changes in brain dynamics that better predict clinical outcomes. Here we hypothesize that stimulation during brain states with less epileptiform activity drives long-term changes that restore healthy brain networks. To test this, we quantified stimulation episodes during low- and high-risk brain states-that is, stimulation during periods with a lower or higher risk of generating epileptiform activity-in a cohort of 40 patients treated with RNS. More frequent stimulation in tonic low-risk states and out of rhythmic high-risk states predicted seizure reduction. Additionally, stimulation events were more likely to be phase-locked to prolonged episodes of abnormal activity for intermediate and poor responders when compared to super-responders, consistent with the hypothesis that improved outcomes are driven by stimulation during low-risk states. These results support the hypothesis that stimulation during low-risk periods might underlie the mechanisms of RNS, suggesting a relationship between temporal patterns of neuromodulation and plasticity that facilitates long-term seizure reduction.

摘要

在耐药性癫痫患者中,针对癫痫样活动的大脑电刺激可以使发作频率降低,症状减轻。这种治疗方法被称为闭环反应性神经刺激(RNS),旨在通过对正在发展的癫痫发作进行靶向刺激,直接阻止癫痫发作。许多 RNS 植入物不会立即阻止发作,而是产生较慢、持续时间较长的大脑动力学变化,从而更好地预测临床结果。在这里,我们假设在癫痫样活动较少的脑状态下进行刺激会产生长期变化,从而恢复健康的大脑网络。为了验证这一点,我们在接受 RNS 治疗的 40 名患者的队列中,对低风险和高风险脑状态下的刺激进行了定量分析——即,在产生癫痫样活动的风险较低或较高的时期进行刺激。与超级应答者相比,在紧张低风险状态下更频繁地进行刺激,以及在节律高风险状态外进行刺激,可预测癫痫发作减少。此外,与超级应答者相比,中间和差反应者的刺激事件更有可能与异常活动的延长发作相位锁定,这与刺激在低风险状态下可改善预后的假设一致。这些结果支持了在低风险期进行刺激可能是 RNS 机制的基础这一假设,表明神经调节和可塑性的时间模式之间存在关系,这有助于长期减少癫痫发作。