Suppr超能文献

双门内镜下脊柱融合手术的系统评价。

A systematic review of biportal endoscopic spinal surgery with interbody fusion.

作者信息

Liawrungrueang Wongthawat, Lee Ho-Jin, Kim Sang Bum, Park Sang-Min, Cholamjiak Watcharaporn, Park Hyun-Jin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2025 Apr;19(2):275-291. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0425. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

Abstract

Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) with interbody fusion is a relatively novel minimally invasive technique that was developed to reduce soft tissue trauma and intraoperative blood loss and shorten recovery time while achieving comparable clinical outcomes for lumbar degenerative diseases. Despite the growing interest in BESS, a comprehensive analysis of its effectiveness, complication rates, and long-term outcomes remains lacking. This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes, surgical efficacy, and complication rates of BESS with interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. Recent literature on endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion was included to expand the scope and gain new perspectives, thereby, providing a comparative analysis that highlighted the advantages, limitations, and emerging trends in minimally invasive spine surgery. This review synthesized current evidence to guide future research and clinical applications. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using a combination of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms and relevant keywords, PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies published between January 2000 and September 2024. The studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions) tool to determine the risk of bias. From the 12 studies that provided clinical evidence, the data extracted were patient demographics; operative time; blood loss; clinical outcomes, such as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and fusion rates; and complications. The mean operative time ranged from 98 to 206 minutes, with fusion rates between 70% and 95%. Most studies reported significant improvements in VAS scores for back and leg pain and ODI scores. Complications, including dural tears (2.9%-6.4%) and hematomas (1.4%-4.3%), were infrequent but notable. BESS with interbody fusion demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes, high fusion rates, and few complications. Although these results are promising, more randomized controlled trials and long-term studies are required to confirm the broader applicability, particularly in more complex or multilevel spinal pathologies.

摘要

双门内镜下脊柱融合手术(BESS)是一种相对新颖的微创手术技术,旨在减少软组织创伤和术中失血,缩短恢复时间,同时在腰椎退行性疾病的治疗中取得相当的临床效果。尽管人们对BESS的兴趣日益浓厚,但对其有效性、并发症发生率和长期疗效仍缺乏全面分析。本系统评价评估了BESS椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效、手术效果和并发症发生率。纳入了近期关于内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的文献,以扩大范围并获得新的观点,从而进行比较分析,突出微创脊柱手术的优势、局限性和新趋势。本综述综合了当前证据,以指导未来的研究和临床应用。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,结合医学主题词(MeSH)术语和相关关键词,系统检索了PubMed/Medline和Scopus数据库中2000年1月至2024年9月发表的研究。使用ROBINS-I(干预非随机研究中的偏倚风险)工具评估研究,以确定偏倚风险。从提供临床证据的12项研究中,提取的数据包括患者人口统计学资料、手术时间、失血量、临床疗效(如视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分以及融合率)和并发症。平均手术时间为98至206分钟,融合率在70%至95%之间。大多数研究报告称,背部和腿部疼痛的VAS评分以及ODI评分有显著改善。并发症包括硬膜撕裂(2.9%-6.4%)和血肿(1.4%-4.3%),虽不常见但值得注意。BESS椎间融合术显示出良好的临床疗效、高融合率和较少的并发症。尽管这些结果很有前景,但仍需要更多的随机对照试验和长期研究来证实其更广泛的适用性,特别是在更复杂或多节段脊柱病变中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d93/12061607/15d5872c184f/asj-2024-0425f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验