Zeng Chufeng, Zhang Xu, Jia Bei, Hu Yi, Lin Peng, Fu Jianhua, Long Hao, Rong Tiehua, Su Xiaodong
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17206-y.
The impact of anastomotic leak (AL) on the long-term survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study investigated whether AL influences the long-term survival of patients with ESCC following McKeown esophagectomy.
An original database was queried to identify patients with ESCC who underwent McKeown esophagectomy between 2012 and 2020 at a high-volume cancer center. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for the confounding factors.
A total of 1614 patients were included, of whom 16.9% developed AL. In patients without neoadjuvant therapy, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 55.8% and 62.0%, and the 5-year DFS was 48.7% and 59.1%, respectively (OS: p = 0.37, DFS: p = 0.046). In the neoadjuvant cohort, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 57.9% and 63.2%, and the 5-year DFS was 55.4% and 58.8%, respectively (OS: p = 0.48, DFS: p = 0.78). Moreover, AL significantly increased the risk of distant recurrence in patients without neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.023).
These findings suggest that AL negatively influences DFS in patients without neoadjuvant therapy, but does not significantly affect long-term survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Intensive treatment and follow-up plan should be considered when patients without neoadjuvant therapy.
吻合口漏(AL)对食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者长期生存的影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了AL是否影响McKeown食管癌切除术后ESCC患者的长期生存。
查询原始数据库,以识别2012年至2020年期间在一家大型癌症中心接受McKeown食管癌切除术的ESCC患者。使用Kaplan-Meier(KM)曲线比较总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)。采用Cox回归分析进行多变量分析。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于调整混杂因素。
共纳入1614例患者,其中16.9%发生了AL。在未接受新辅助治疗的患者中,有和没有AL的患者5年OS分别为55.8%和62.0%,5年DFS分别为48.7%和59.1%(OS:p = 0.37,DFS:p = 0.046)。在新辅助治疗队列中,有和没有AL的患者5年OS分别为57.9%和63.2%,5年DFS分别为55.4%和58.8%(OS:p = 0.48,DFS:p = 0.78)。此外,AL显著增加了未接受新辅助治疗患者远处复发的风险(p = 0.023)。
这些发现表明,AL对未接受新辅助治疗的患者的DFS有负面影响,但对接受新辅助治疗的患者的长期生存没有显著影响。对于未接受新辅助治疗的患者,应考虑强化治疗和随访计划。