Kaya Merve, Schaddelee Matthieu C A, Creutzberg Carien L, Kroep Judith R, Horeweg Nanda
Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Jun;35(6):101759. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101759. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
PD-(L)1 inhibitors have shown benefit in mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) endometrial cancer. However, their efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (comprising POLE-mutated (POLEmut), p53-abnormal (p53abn), and no-specific-molecular-profile (NSMP) molecular classes) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, across the 4 molecular classes.
Systematic searches were conducted across Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with manual searches of reference lists and conference websites. A total of 7 reports on 5 clinical trials were identified, with 3 included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed.
In patients with primary advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer (n=215), adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62) and progression-free survival (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.53). In patients with p53abn endometrial cancer, no significant benefits in overall (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.22; n=135) or progression-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.70; n=326) were observed, but both were affected by significant heterogeneity. In patients with NSMP endometrial cancer, a significant benefit was observed for progression-free survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95; n=373), but no overall survival benefit (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.39; n=242). Insufficient data were available for patients with POLEmut endometrial cancer (n=12), with no events reported in 2 of 3 clinical trials comprising the majority of patients (n=11).
PD-(L)1 inhibition demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer. In NSMP endometrial cancer, adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy showed potential benefit, whereas in p53abn endometrial cancer, such benefit was not found. POLEmut endometrial cancer, although rare in recurrent or metastatic settings, was associated with a favorable prognosis, regardless of treatment. These findings underscore the relevance of the molecular classification of endometrial cancer and highlight the importance of prioritizing molecular analyses in clinical trials to guide personalized PD-(L)1 inhibition strategies.
PD-(L)1抑制剂已显示出对错配修复缺陷(MMRd)子宫内膜癌有益。然而,它们在错配修复 proficient 子宫内膜癌(包括POLE突变(POLEmut)、p53异常(p53abn)和无特定分子特征(NSMP)分子类别)中的疗效仍不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了PD-(L)1抑制剂作为单一疗法或与化疗联合使用在这4种分子类别中的疗效。
在Embase、PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science上进行系统检索,并手动检索参考文献列表和会议网站。共识别出5项临床试验的7份报告,其中3项纳入荟萃分析。评估总生存期和无进展生存期。
在原发性晚期或复发性MMRd子宫内膜癌患者(n = 215)中,在铂类化疗基础上加用PD-(L)1抑制剂显著改善了总生存期(HR 0.36,95%CI 0.21至0.62)和无进展生存期(HR 0.35,95%CI 0.23至0.53)。在p53abn子宫内膜癌患者中,未观察到总生存期(HR 0.91,95%CI 0.26至3.22;n = 135)或无进展生存期(HR 0.84,95%CI 0.41至1.70;n = 326)有显著益处,但两者均受显著异质性影响。在NSMP子宫内膜癌患者中,观察到无进展生存期有显著益处(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.57至0.95;n = 373),但总生存期无益处(HR 0.93,95%CI 0.63至1.39;n = 242)。POLEmut子宫内膜癌患者的数据不足(n = 12),在包括大多数患者(n = 11)的3项临床试验中的2项中未报告任何事件。
PD-(L)1抑制在晚期或复发性MMRd子宫内膜癌患者中显示出显著疗效。在NSMP子宫内膜癌中,在铂类化疗基础上加用PD-(L)1抑制剂显示出潜在益处,而在p53abn子宫内膜癌中未发现此类益处。POLEmut子宫内膜癌虽然在复发或转移情况下罕见,但无论治疗如何,预后良好。这些发现强调了子宫内膜癌分子分类的相关性,并突出了在临床试验中优先进行分子分析以指导个性化PD-(L)1抑制策略的重要性。