Suppr超能文献

在一所历史悠久的黑人医学院中,将扩大社区参与研究变革的障碍和促进因素置于具体情境中。

Contextualizing barriers and facilitators to scaling community-engaged research transformation at a historically black medical school.

作者信息

Akintobi Tabia Henry, Holliday Rhonda, Hoffman LaShawn, Rollins Latrice, Daniels Yvette, Grant Howard, Kottke Melissa

机构信息

Morehouse School of Medicine/Prevention Research Center, Atlanta, USA.

Hoffman and Associates, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 24;9(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.32. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) embodies an applied definition of community engagement advanced over four decades. The increased demand for community collaboration requires attention to the supporting community-engaged research. MSM partnered with the University of New Mexico Center for Participatory Research for the Engage for Equity (E2) PLUS Project to assess, ideate, and consider existing and recommended institutional supports for community-engaged research.

METHODS

MSM assembled a community-campus Champion Team. The team coordinated virtual workshops with 18 community and academic research partners, facilitated four interviews of executive leaders and two focus groups (researchers/research staff and patients/community members, respectively) moderated by UNM-CPR. Analyses of the transcripts were conducted using an inductive and deductive process. Once the themes were identified, the qualitative summaries were shared with the Champion Team to verify and discuss implications for action and institutional improvements.

RESULTS

Institutional strengths and opportunities for systemic change were aligned with equity indicators (power and control, decision-making, and influence) and contextual factors (history, trust, and relationship building) of The continuum of community engagement in research. Institutional advances include community-engagement added as the fourth pillar of the institution's strategic plan. Action strategies include 1) development a research navigation system to address community-campus research partnership administrative challenges and 2) an academy to build the capacities of community/patient partners to acquire, manage, and sustain grants and negotiate equity in dissemination of research.

CONCLUSIONS

MSM has leveraged E2 PLUS to identify systems improvements necessary to ensure that community/patient-centered research and partnerships are amplified and sustained.

摘要

引言

莫尔豪斯医学院(MSM)体现了四十多年来不断发展的社区参与的应用定义。对社区合作的需求日益增加,这需要关注支持社区参与研究的工作。MSM与新墨西哥大学参与式研究中心合作开展了“公平参与(E2)加项目”,以评估、构思并考虑现有的和推荐的社区参与研究的机构支持措施。

方法

MSM组建了一个社区-校园冠军团队。该团队与18个社区和学术研究伙伴协调开展了虚拟研讨会,促成了对行政领导的四次访谈以及由新墨西哥大学参与式研究中心主持的两个焦点小组讨论(分别为研究人员/研究 staff和患者/社区成员)。使用归纳和演绎过程对访谈记录进行分析。一旦确定了主题,就会与冠军团队分享定性总结,以核实并讨论行动和机构改进的影响。

结果

机构的优势和系统性变革的机会与研究中社区参与连续体的公平指标(权力和控制、决策和影响力)以及背景因素(历史、信任和关系建立)相一致。机构的进步包括将社区参与作为机构战略计划的第四大支柱。行动策略包括:1)开发一个研究导航系统,以应对社区-校园研究伙伴关系的行政挑战;2)设立一个学院,培养社区/患者伙伴获取、管理和维持资助以及在研究传播中协商公平性的能力。

结论

MSM利用E2加项目确定了必要的系统改进措施,以确保以社区/患者为中心的研究和伙伴关系得到加强和持续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cba/11975764/d41a3f62c771/S2059866125000329_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验