• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用E2PLUS工具和资源,以促进癌症中心以患者为中心且社区参与的研究机构能力的发展。

Adoption of E2PLUS tools and resources to promote the development of institutional capacity for patient-centered and community-engaged research at a cancer center.

作者信息

Briant Katherine J, Adsul Prajakta, Carosso Elizabeth A, Chakoian Marty, Mapes Diane, Coutee Terri, Hempstead Bridgette, Hassell Laurie, Law Wendy, Mendoza Jason A

机构信息

Fred Hutch/University of Washington/Seattle Children's Cancer Consortium, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico and Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb 12;9(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.27. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.27
PMID:40201639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11975779/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Fred Hutch/University of Washington/Seattle Children's Cancer Consortium's (Consortium) Office of Community Outreach & Engagement (OCOE) joined Stanford Medicine and Morehouse School of Medicine in implementing Engage for Equity Plus (E2PLUS), a multi-institutional community of practice to learn and share patient-centered and community-engaged research (P/CEnR) practices. University of New Mexico (UNM) facilitated this collaboration.

METHODS

The Consortium formed a Champion Team of 12 people who participated in two virtual workshops facilitated by UNM. Consortium executive leadership ( = 4) participated in interviews, and investigators ( = 4) and community members/patient advocates ( = 8) participated in focus groups to provide institutional context regarding P/CEnR. This is a paper on the process and findings.

RESULTS

Through E2PLUS engagement, the Champion Team identified four strategies to address institutional health inequities: 1) increase participation of underrepresented groups at all levels of institutional leadership and advisory boards; 2) create an Office of Patient Engagement to train and support patients who participate in institutional initiatives and advise research teams; 3) expand community engagement training, resources, and institutional commitment to focus on community-identified social and health needs; and 4) establish an umbrella entity for health equity efforts across the Consortium.

CONCLUSION

While the Consortium had longstanding community advisory boards and faculty and staff with P/CEnR expertise, it did not have centralized and institutionally supported P/CEnR resources, policies, and infrastructure. By participating in E2PLUS, the Champion Team received technical assistance to leverage qualitative data to influence strategies to guide the development of Consortium health equity infrastructure and capacity for P/CEnR in Washington.

摘要

引言

弗雷德·哈钦森癌症研究中心/华盛顿大学/西雅图儿童医院癌症联盟(联盟)的社区外展与参与办公室(OCOE)与斯坦福大学医学院和莫尔豪斯医学院合作,实施了“公平参与升级版”(E2PLUS)项目,这是一个多机构实践社区,旨在学习和分享以患者为中心和社区参与的研究(P/CEnR)实践。新墨西哥大学(UNM)促成了此次合作。

方法

联盟组建了一个由12人组成的冠军团队,他们参加了由新墨西哥大学举办的两次虚拟研讨会。联盟的行政领导(n = 4)参与了访谈,研究人员(n = 4)和社区成员/患者倡导者(n = 8)参与了焦点小组讨论,以提供关于P/CEnR的机构背景信息。本文介绍了该过程及研究结果。

结果

通过参与E2PLUS项目,冠军团队确定了四种解决机构健康不平等问题的策略:1)增加代表性不足群体在机构各级领导和咨询委员会中的参与度;2)设立患者参与办公室,培训和支持参与机构倡议的患者,并为研究团队提供建议;3)扩大社区参与培训、资源以及机构投入,以关注社区确定的社会和健康需求;4)为联盟内的健康公平工作设立一个总体实体。

结论

虽然联盟长期设有社区咨询委员会,且有具备P/CEnR专业知识的教职员工,但缺乏集中且得到机构支持的P/CEnR资源、政策和基础设施。通过参与E2PLUS项目,冠军团队获得了技术援助,以利用定性数据来影响策略,从而指导联盟健康公平基础设施的发展以及华盛顿州P/CEnR的能力建设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab3/11975779/9e679fe1cafb/S2059866125000275_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab3/11975779/699da66e5b3d/S2059866125000275_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab3/11975779/ee7efbd8345b/S2059866125000275_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab3/11975779/9e679fe1cafb/S2059866125000275_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab3/11975779/699da66e5b3d/S2059866125000275_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab3/11975779/ee7efbd8345b/S2059866125000275_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab3/11975779/9e679fe1cafb/S2059866125000275_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Adoption of E2PLUS tools and resources to promote the development of institutional capacity for patient-centered and community-engaged research at a cancer center.采用E2PLUS工具和资源,以促进癌症中心以患者为中心且社区参与的研究机构能力的发展。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb 12;9(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.27. eCollection 2025.
2
Engaging stakeholders to strengthen support for community-engaged research at Stanford School of Medicine: An institutional assessment and action planning approach.让利益相关者参与进来,以加强斯坦福医学院对社区参与研究的支持:一种机构评估和行动计划方法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 24;9(1):e36. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.8. eCollection 2025.
3
Developing the engage for equity institutional multi-sector survey: Assessing academic institutional culture and climate for community-based participatory research (CBPR).开展促进公平的机构多部门调查:评估基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)的学术机构文化与氛围。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb 5;9(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.20. eCollection 2025.
4
Contextualizing barriers and facilitators to scaling community-engaged research transformation at a historically black medical school.在一所历史悠久的黑人医学院中,将扩大社区参与研究变革的障碍和促进因素置于具体情境中。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 24;9(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.32. eCollection 2025.
5
Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.转变领域:学术健康中心在促进和维持基于公平的社区参与式研究中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1111779. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111779. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research.评估学术健康机构内部的环境,以改进基于公平性、社区参与和患者参与的研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 11;9(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.675. eCollection 2025.
7
Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference.2017年社区参与研究(CEnR)科学进展会议论文集
BMC Proc. 2019 Apr 19;13(Suppl 3):3. doi: 10.1186/s12919-019-0164-y. eCollection 2019.
8
Addressing institutional and community barriers to development and implementation of community-engaged research through competency-based academic and community training.通过基于能力的学术和社区培训,解决社区参与式研究的发展和实施中的制度和社区障碍。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:1070475. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1070475. eCollection 2022.
9
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
10
Institutional community engagement leader perspectives on supporting ethical community-engaged research.机构社区参与领导者对支持符合伦理的社区参与研究的看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 6;9(1):e27. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.1165. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research.评估学术健康机构内部的环境,以改进基于公平性、社区参与和患者参与的研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 11;9(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.675. eCollection 2025.
2
Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.转变领域:学术健康中心在促进和维持基于公平的社区参与式研究中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1111779. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111779. eCollection 2023.
3
Engage for Equity: Advancing the Fields of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-engaged Research in Community Psychology and the Social Sciences.
参与公平:在社区心理学和社会科学领域推进基于社区的参与性研究和社区参与性研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Jun;67(3-4):251-255. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12530. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
CBPR Implementation Framework for Community-Academic Partnerships.社区-学术伙伴关系的 CBPR 实施框架。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Jun;67(3-4):284-296. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
5
Eat Healthy, Be Active Community Workshops implemented with rural Hispanic women.与农村西班牙裔妇女合作实施健康饮食、积极生活社区研讨会。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01157-5.
6
Engage for Equity: Development of Community-Based Participatory Research Tools.参与公平:社区参与式研究工具的开发。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):359-371. doi: 10.1177/1090198120921188.
7
Educating Latinas about cervical cancer and HPV: a pilot randomized study.向拉丁裔女性开展宫颈癌和人乳头瘤病毒教育:一项随机对照试验的初步研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Apr;30(4):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01150-w. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
8
Disseminating Pesticide Exposure Results to Farmworker and Nonfarmworker Families in an Agricultural Community: A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach.向农业社区中的农场工人和非农场工人家庭传播农药暴露结果:一种社区参与式研究方法。
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct;59(10):982-987. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001107.
9
Strategies To Empower Communities To Reduce Health Disparities.增强社区能力以减少健康差距的策略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1424-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1364.
10
"I did it for us and I would do it again": perspectives of rural latinos on providing biospecimens for research.“我这样做是为了我们,我还会再这样做”:农村拉丁裔人群对为研究提供生物样本的看法。
Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):911-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301726. Epub 2014 Mar 13.