• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用多部门方法促进亚利桑那州农村地区的健康公平:社区参与的调查开发与实施研究

Using a Multisectoral Approach to Advance Health Equity in Rural Arizona: Community-Engaged Survey Development and Implementation Study.

作者信息

Remiker Mark, Sabo Samantha, Jiménez Dulce, Samarron Longorio Alexandra, Chief Carmenlita, Williamson Heather, Teufel-Shone Nicolette

机构信息

Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 12;5(5):e25577. doi: 10.2196/25577.

DOI:10.2196/25577
PMID:33978596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8156115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, public health research and practice sectors have shifted their focus away from identifying health disparities and toward addressing the social, environmental, and economic determinants of health equity. Given the complex and interrelated nature of these determinants, developing policies that will advance health equity requires collaboration across sectors outside of health. However, engaging various stakeholder groups, tapping into their unique knowledge systems, and identifying common objectives across sectors is difficult and time consuming and can impede collaborative efforts.

OBJECTIVE

The Southwest Health Equity Research Collaborative at Northern Arizona University, in partnership with an 11-member community advisory council, is addressing this need with a joint community-campus effort to develop and implement a Regional Health Equity Survey (RHES) designed to generate an interdisciplinary body of knowledge, which will be used to guide future multisectoral action for improving community health and well-being.

METHODS

Researchers and community partners used facilitated discussions and free listing techniques to generate survey items. The community partners pilot tested the survey instrument to evaluate its feasibility and duration before survey administration. Respondent-driven sampling was used to ensure that participants included leadership from across all sectors and regions of northern Arizona.

RESULTS

Over the course of 6 months, 206 participants representing 13 sectors across the 5 counties of northern Arizona were recruited to participate in an RHES. Survey response rates, completion percentage, and sector representation were used to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of using a community-engaged apporach for survey development and participant recruitment. The findings describe the current capacity to impact health equity by using a multisectoral approach in northern Arizona.

CONCLUSIONS

The Southwest Health Equity Research Collaborative effectively engaged community members to assist with the development and implementation of an RHES aimed at understanding and promoting multisectoral action on the root causes of health inequity. The results will help to build research and evaluation capacity to address the social, economic, and environmental conditions of health inequity in the region.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,公共卫生研究和实践部门已将重点从识别健康差异转向解决健康公平的社会、环境和经济决定因素。鉴于这些决定因素的复杂性和相互关联性,制定促进健康公平的政策需要卫生领域以外各部门的合作。然而,让不同的利益相关者群体参与进来,利用他们独特的知识体系,并确定各部门的共同目标既困难又耗时,可能会阻碍合作努力。

目的

北亚利桑那大学的西南健康公平研究协作组织与一个由11名成员组成的社区咨询委员会合作,通过社区与校园的联合努力来满足这一需求,开发并实施一项区域健康公平调查(RHES),旨在生成一个跨学科的知识体系,用于指导未来改善社区健康和福祉的多部门行动。

方法

研究人员和社区合作伙伴采用促进性讨论和自由列举技术来生成调查项目。社区合作伙伴在进行调查之前对调查工具进行了预测试,以评估其可行性和时长。采用应答者驱动抽样以确保参与者包括北亚利桑那州所有部门和地区的领导层。

结果

在6个月的时间里,招募了代表北亚利桑那州5个县13个部门的206名参与者参与区域健康公平调查。调查回复率、完成百分比和部门代表性用于评估采用社区参与方法进行调查开发和参与者招募的有效性和可行性。研究结果描述了目前在北亚利桑那州采用多部门方法影响健康公平的能力。

结论

西南健康公平研究协作组织有效地让社区成员参与进来,协助开发和实施一项区域健康公平调查,旨在理解和促进针对健康不公平根源的多部门行动。研究结果将有助于建立研究和评估能力,以应对该地区健康不公平的社会、经济和环境状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/419c98bcf71a/formative_v5i5e25577_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/6b5010080824/formative_v5i5e25577_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/da3f828ad5a5/formative_v5i5e25577_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/b8aff0a8bf2e/formative_v5i5e25577_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/13e80f23cc86/formative_v5i5e25577_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/419c98bcf71a/formative_v5i5e25577_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/6b5010080824/formative_v5i5e25577_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/da3f828ad5a5/formative_v5i5e25577_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/b8aff0a8bf2e/formative_v5i5e25577_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/13e80f23cc86/formative_v5i5e25577_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7b/8156115/419c98bcf71a/formative_v5i5e25577_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a Multisectoral Approach to Advance Health Equity in Rural Arizona: Community-Engaged Survey Development and Implementation Study.采用多部门方法促进亚利桑那州农村地区的健康公平:社区参与的调查开发与实施研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 12;5(5):e25577. doi: 10.2196/25577.
2
A multisectoral approach to advance health equity in rural northern Arizona: county-level leaders' perspectives on health equity.多部门合作促进亚利桑那州北部农村地区健康公平:县级领导对健康公平的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 13;22(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13279-6.
3
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
4
Employing the equity lens to understand multisectoral partnerships: lessons learned from a mixed-method study in Canada.运用公平视角理解多部门伙伴关系:来自加拿大混合方法研究的经验教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 26;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01746-w.
5
Multisectoral interventions for urban health in Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review.非洲城市卫生的多部门干预措施:一项混合方法系统评价。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2325726. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2325726. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
Health Impacts of Perchlorate and Pesticide Exposure: Protocol for Community-Engaged Research to Evaluate Environmental Toxicants in a US Border Community.高氯酸盐和农药暴露对健康的影响:美国边境社区评估环境毒物的社区参与研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 11;10(8):e15864. doi: 10.2196/15864.
7
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
8
Communities organizing to promote equity: engaging local communities in public health responses to health inequities exacerbated by COVID-19-protocol paper.社区组织促进公平:将地方社区纳入应对 COVID-19 加剧的健康不公平问题的公共卫生应对措施中——方案文件。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 24;12:1369777. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369777. eCollection 2024.
9
Stakeholder-driven principles for advancing equity through shared measurement.利益相关者驱动的原则,通过共同衡量来促进公平。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):291-303. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14031. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
10
A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea.社区主导合作减少韩国贫困社区健康不平等的利益相关者分析。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):35-44. doi: 10.1177/1757975918791517. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextualizing barriers and facilitators to scaling community-engaged research transformation at a historically black medical school.在一所历史悠久的黑人医学院中,将扩大社区参与研究变革的障碍和促进因素置于具体情境中。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 24;9(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.32. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of a comprehensive survey to assess key socioecological determinants of health.开发一项全面调查以评估健康的关键社会生态决定因素。
Surgery. 2024 Apr;175(4):991-999. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
3
Employing the equity lens to understand multisectoral partnerships: lessons learned from a mixed-method study in Canada.

本文引用的文献

1
Survey Development: Community Involvement in the Design and Implementation Process.调查问卷开发:设计和实施过程中的社区参与。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Sep/Oct;25 Suppl 5, Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years(Suppl 5 TRIBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTERS ADVANCING PUBLIC HEALTH IN INDIAN COUNTRY FOR OVER 20 YEARS):S77-S83. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001016.
2
Making Strides Toward Health Equity: The Experiences of Public Health Departments.迈向健康公平:公共卫生部门的经验
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Jul/Aug;25(4):342-347. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000852.
3
运用公平视角理解多部门伙伴关系:来自加拿大混合方法研究的经验教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 26;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01746-w.
4
Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.促进多部门协作以在农村社区实施癌症控制干预措施:一项描述性定性研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Aug 11;19:E48. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210450.
5
Grounding implementation science in health equity for cancer prevention and control.将实施科学基于癌症预防与控制的健康公平之上。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 3;3(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00311-4.
6
A multisectoral approach to advance health equity in rural northern Arizona: county-level leaders' perspectives on health equity.多部门合作促进亚利桑那州北部农村地区健康公平:县级领导对健康公平的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 13;22(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13279-6.
7
Moving the needle on health inequities: principles and tactics for effective cross-sector population health networks.推动健康不平等问题的解决:有效跨部门人口健康网络的原则和策略。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2022 Feb 1;34(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001085.
Multisectoral approach for promoting public health.
多部门合作促进公共卫生。
Indian J Public Health. 2017 Jul-Sep;61(3):163-168. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_220_17.
4
Building a National Culture of Health: Background, Action Framework, Measures, and Next Steps.构建全民健康文化:背景、行动框架、措施及后续步骤。
Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 13;6(2):3. eCollection 2017 Jan.
5
Differences in Access to and Use of Electronic Personal Health Information Between Rural and Urban Residents in the United States.美国农村和城市居民在获取和使用电子个人健康信息方面的差异。
J Rural Health. 2018 Feb;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s30-s38. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12228. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
6
How to build a culture of health.如何构建健康文化。
QJM. 2017 Feb 1;110(2):59-60. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw192.
7
Reducing Health Inequities in the U.S.: Recommendations From the NHLBI's Health Inequities Think Tank Meeting.减少美国的健康不平等:美国国立心、肺、血液研究所健康不平等问题智囊团会议的建议
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 2;68(5):517-524. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.059.
8
Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input From Stakeholders to Inform Research.社区参与工作室:一种从利益相关者那里获取有意义的意见以指导研究的结构化方法。
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1646-50. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000794.
9
Widening rural-urban disparities in life expectancy, U.S., 1969-2009.预期寿命城乡差距扩大,美国,1969-2009 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):e19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.017.
10
Intersectoral action for health equity: a rapid systematic review.跨部门行动促进健康公平:快速系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Nov 9;13:1056. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1056.