Egwumba Patricia, Wang Haiquan, Nellums Laura, Bains Manpreet, Chattopadhyay Kaushik
Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.
School of Exercise and Health Shanghai University of Sport Shanghai China.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 8;8(4):e70624. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70624. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Ayurveda, a traditional system of medicine, has gained recognition in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries as a complementary and alternative medicine for managing noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Qualitative studies have been conducted in various OECD countries regarding the use of Ayurveda for NCD management. However, no qualitative systematic review has been conducted on this topic.
This review aimed to synthesize the experiences, perceptions, and perspectives of patients with NCDs and Ayurvedic practitioners on the use of Ayurveda for NCD management in OECD countries.
The JBI qualitative systematic review guidelines were followed. Several databases were searched to identify published and unpublished qualitative studies.
Of the 18,541 records identified, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Using the JBI checklist for qualitative research (10 criteria), the critical appraisal scores of the studies ranged from moderate to high quality. Patients turned to Ayurveda because of concerns about side effects and dissatisfaction with conventional Western treatments and were driven by the perceived gentleness and holistic qualities of Ayurveda. Complementing these patient insights, Ayurvedic practitioners emphasized that Ayurveda identifies and addresses the root causes of diseases rather than treating symptoms alone. Integration challenges, limited medication access, and regulatory constraints were identified as factors affecting Ayurveda's service delivery.
Patients preferred Ayurveda because of its natural approach and fewer side effects, whereas Ayurvedic practitioners valued its holistic approach. However, its wider acceptance has been hampered by hurdles such as regulatory barriers and limited access to medicines. Strategies to overcome some of the barriers identified in this review as well as to promote the strengths discussed in this review may facilitate the effective use of Ayurveda to manage NCDs in OECD countries. PROSPERO, Registration No. CRD42023397952.
阿育吠陀医学作为一种传统医学体系,在经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家已被认可为一种用于管理非传染性疾病(NCDs)的补充和替代医学。经合组织的各个国家都已开展了关于使用阿育吠陀医学管理非传染性疾病的定性研究。然而,尚未针对该主题进行定性系统评价。
本评价旨在综合经合组织国家中患有非传染性疾病的患者以及阿育吠陀医学从业者在使用阿育吠陀医学管理非传染性疾病方面的经验、看法和观点。
遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)定性系统评价指南。检索了多个数据库,以识别已发表和未发表的定性研究。
在识别出的18541条记录中,有9项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入本评价。使用JBI定性研究核对清单(10项标准),这些研究的批判性评价分数从中等到高质量不等。患者转向阿育吠陀医学是因为担心副作用以及对传统西医治疗不满,并且受到阿育吠陀医学所具有的温和性和整体性特质的驱使。补充这些患者见解的是,阿育吠陀医学从业者强调,阿育吠陀医学识别并解决疾病的根本原因,而不仅仅是治疗症状。整合方面的挑战、药物获取受限以及监管限制被确定为影响阿育吠陀医学服务提供的因素。
患者因阿育吠陀医学的自然疗法和较少副作用而青睐它,而阿育吠陀医学从业者则重视其整体疗法。然而,其更广泛的接受受到监管障碍和药物获取受限等障碍的阻碍。克服本评价中确定的一些障碍以及推广本评价中讨论的优势的策略,可能有助于在经合组织国家有效利用阿育吠陀医学来管理非传染性疾病。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO),注册号CRD42023397952。