Chattopadhyay Kaushik, Wang Haiquan, Kaur Jaspreet, Nalbant Gamze, Almaqhawi Abdullah, Kundakci Burak, Panniyammakal Jeemon, Heinrich Michael, Lewis Sarah Anne, Greenfield Sheila Margaret, Tandon Nikhil, Biswas Tuhin Kanti, Kinra Sanjay, Leonardi-Bee Jo
Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
The Nottingham Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 8;13:821810. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821810. eCollection 2022.
Many Ayurvedic medicines have the potential for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with previous systematic reviews demonstrating effectiveness and safety for specific Ayurvedic medicines. However, many of the reviews need updating and none provide a comprehensive summary of all the Ayurvedic medicines evaluated for managing T2DM. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness and safety of Ayurvedic medicines for managing T2DM. Published and unpublished RCTs assessing the effectiveness and safety of Ayurvedic medicines for managing T2DM in adults. The JBI systematic review methodology was followed. A comprehensive search of sources (including 18 electronic databases) from inception to 16 January 2021 was made. No language restrictions were applied. Data synthesis was conducted using narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analyses, where appropriate. Pooled results are reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Out of 32,519 records identified from the searches, 219 articles were included in the systematic review representing 199 RCTs (21,191 participants) of 98 Ayurvedic medicines. Overall, in the studies reviewed the methodology was not adequately reported, resulting in poorer methodological quality scoring. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was reduced using (L.) Corrêa (MD -1.6%; 95% CI -3 to -0.3), Roxb. (-0.5; -0.7 to -0.4), (Thunb.) Makino (-1; -1.5 to -0.6), L. (-0.3; -0.4 to -0.1), L. (-0.4; -0.6 to -0.1), Forssk. (-0.9; -1.4 to -0.3), (Willd.) Hook.f. and Thomson (-0.5; -0.6 to -0.5), L. (-0.6; -0.9 to -0.4), and L. (-1.3; -2.4 to -0.2) compared to control. Similarly, fasting blood glucose (FBG) was reduced by 4-56 mg/dl for a range of Ayurvedic medicines. Very few studies assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Adverse events were not reported in many studies, and if reported, these were mostly none to mild and predominately related to the gastrointestinal tract. The current evidence suggests the benefit of a range of Ayurvedic medicines in improving glycemic control in T2DM patients. Given the limitations of the available evidence and to strengthen the evidence base, high-quality RCTs should be conducted and reported.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023-1-30
Health Technol Assess. 2020-6
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025-5-12
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-3-3
Int J Mol Sci. 2024-9-29
Front Pharmacol. 2024-1-15
Front Pharmacol. 2021-7-20
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020-10-9