Suppr超能文献

新型降糖药物对老年2型糖尿病患者心血管疗效的比较:一项目标试验模拟队列研究

Comparative cardiovascular effectiveness of newer glucose-lowering drugs in elderly with type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation cohort study.

作者信息

Kosjerina Vanja, Parsa Motahareh, Scheuer Stine Hedegaard, Ankarfeldt Mikkel Zöllner, Sørensen Kathrine Kold, Brock Birgitte, Vistisen Dorte, Bjerring Clemmensen Kim Katrine, Rungby Jørgen

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 21;82:103162. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103162. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reducing risk of cardiovascular disease is crucial in managing type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study assessed the comparative cardiovascular effectiveness of newer glucose-lowering drugs in real-world elderly individuals with T2D, and examined how age modified these effects.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using Danish nationwide registries to emulate a three-arm randomized clinical trial. Participants aged ≥70 years were new users of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), between 2012 and 2020. We estimated the overall and age-specific incidence rate ratios (IRR) of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) using Poisson regression models. Summarized weights were used to balance baseline characteristics and treatment adherence.

FINDINGS

The study included 35,679 participants (DPP-4is: 21,848 (62%), GLP1-RAs: 5702 (16%), SGLT-2is: 8129 (23%)). In the as-treated analysis, GLP1-RAs and SGLT-2is were associated with significantly reduced rates of 3P-MACE and HHF compared to DPP-4is. The overall IRR for 3P-MACE was 0.68 (95% CI 0.65-0.71) (GLP1-RAs vs. DPP4is) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.63-0.68) (SGLT-2is vs. DPP4is), while for HHF the IRR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.88) (GLP1-RAs vs. DPP4is) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.66) (SGLT-2is vs. DPP4is). These effects were predominantly independent of age. No significant difference was observed between SGLT-2is and GLP1-RAs on 3P-MACE, however, SGLT-2is were associated with a significant reduction of HHF, compared to GLP1-RAs, with an overall IRR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83), and with age-dependent variations for both outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

In the elderly, use of GLP1-RAs and SGLT-2is was associated with reduced rates of 3P-MACE and HHF compared to DPP-4is, independent of age. SGLT-2is were also associated with reduced rates of HHF compared to GLP1-RAs, largely independent of age, in this population of individuals aged 70 years and above. This provides real-world evidence on the comparative cardiovascular effectiveness of the three most recent glucose-lowering medications and may help strengthen implementation of guidelines into clinical practice.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

降低心血管疾病风险对于2型糖尿病(T2D)的管理至关重要。本研究评估了新型降糖药物在现实世界中患有T2D的老年个体中的相对心血管疗效,并研究了年龄如何改变这些效果。

方法

我们进行了一项队列研究,使用丹麦全国性登记系统来模拟一项三臂随机临床试验。2012年至2020年间,年龄≥70岁的参与者为胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP1-RAs)、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2is)或二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4is)的新使用者。我们使用泊松回归模型估计了3点主要不良心血管事件(3P-MACE)和心力衰竭住院(HHF)的总体及特定年龄发病率比(IRR)。汇总权重用于平衡基线特征和治疗依从性。

结果

该研究纳入了35,679名参与者(DPP-4is:21,848名(62%),GLP1-RAs:5702名(16%),SGLT-2is:8129名(23%))。在治疗分析中,与DPP-4is相比,GLP1-RAs和SGLT-2is与3P-MACE和HHF发生率显著降低相关。3P-MACE的总体IRR为0.68(95%CI 0.65-0.71)(GLP1-RAs与DPP4is相比)和0.65(95%CI 0.63-0.68)(SGLT-2is与DPP4is相比),而HHF的IRR为0.81(95%CI 0.74-0.88)(GLP1-RAs与DPP4is相比)和0.60(95%CI 0.55-0.66)(SGLT-2is与DPP4is相比)。这些效果在很大程度上与年龄无关。在3P-MACE方面,未观察到SGLT-2is与GLP1-RAs之间存在显著差异,然而,与GLP1-RAs相比,SGLT-2is与HHF显著降低相关,总体IRR为0.75(95%CI 0.67-0.83),且两种结局均存在年龄依赖性差异。

解读

在老年人中,与DPP-4is相比,使用GLP1-RAs和SGLT-2is与3P-MACE和HHF发生率降低相关,与年龄无关。在70岁及以上的人群中,与GLP1-RAs相比,SGLT-2is也与HHF发生率降低相关,在很大程度上与年龄无关。这为三种最新降糖药物的相对心血管疗效提供了现实世界证据,并可能有助于加强将指南应用于临床实践。

资金

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edd5/11976231/944e014fcb7d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验