Suppr超能文献

药物治疗 2 型糖尿病的获益与危害:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Division of Guideline and Rapid Recommendation, Cochrane China Centre, MAGIC China Centre, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ. 2023 Apr 6;381:e074068. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074068.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the benefits and harms of drug treatments for adults with type 2 diabetes, adding non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (including finerenone) and tirzepatide (a dual glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) to previously existing treatment options.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central up to 14 October 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Eligible randomised controlled trials compared drugs of interest in adults with type 2 diabetes. Eligible trials had a follow-up of 24 weeks or longer. Trials systematically comparing combinations of more than one drug treatment class with no drug, subgroup analyses of randomised controlled trials, and non-English language studies were deemed ineligible. Certainty of evidence was assessed following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) approach.

RESULTS

The analysis identified 816 trials with 471 038 patients, together evaluating 13 different drug classes; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with standard treatments. Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.94; high certainty) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (0.88, 0.82 to 0.93; high certainty) reduce all cause death; non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, so far tested only with finerenone in patients with chronic kidney disease, probably reduce mortality (0.89, 0.79 to 1.00; moderate certainty); other drugs may not. The study confirmed the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, admission to hospital for heart failure, and end stage kidney disease. Finerenone probably reduces admissions to hospital for heart failure and end stage kidney disease, and possibly cardiovascular death. Only GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce non-fatal stroke; SGLT-2 inhibitors are superior to other drugs in reducing end stage kidney disease. GLP-1 receptor agonists and probably SGLT-2 inhibitors and tirzepatide improve quality of life. Reported harms were largely specific to drug class (eg, genital infections with SGLT-2 inhibitors, severe gastrointestinal adverse events with tirzepatide and GLP-1 receptor agonists, hyperkalaemia leading to admission to hospital with finerenone). Tirzepatide probably results in the largest reduction in body weight (mean difference -8.57 kg; moderate certainty). Basal insulin (mean difference 2.15 kg; moderate certainty) and thiazolidinediones (mean difference 2.81 kg; moderate certainty) probably result in the largest increases in body weight. Absolute benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and finerenone vary in people with type 2 diabetes, depending on baseline risks for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes (https://matchit.magicevidence.org/230125dist-diabetes).

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis extends knowledge beyond confirming the substantial benefits with the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing adverse cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and death by adding information on finerenone and tirzepatide. These findings highlight the need for continuous assessment of scientific progress to introduce cutting edge updates in clinical practice guidelines for people with type 2 diabetes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022325948.

摘要

目的

比较 2 型糖尿病成人患者的药物治疗的获益和危害,将非甾体类盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(包括非奈利酮)和替西帕肽(双重葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素促分泌多肽(GIP)/胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂)添加到先前存在的治疗选择中。

设计

系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

数据来源

截至 2022 年 10 月 14 日,Ovid Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 中央数据库。

入选研究的标准

纳入比较 2 型糖尿病成人患者中感兴趣药物的随机对照试验。合格试验的随访时间为 24 周或更长。系统性比较一种以上药物治疗类别与无药物、随机对照试验的亚组分析以及非英语语言研究被认为不符合入选标准。证据的确定性采用 GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)方法进行评估。

结果

分析确定了 816 项试验,涉及 471038 名患者,共评估了 13 种不同的药物类别;所有后续估计均指与标准治疗的比较。钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂(比值比 0.88,95%置信区间 0.83 至 0.94;高确定性)和 GLP-1 受体激动剂(0.88,0.82 至 0.93;高确定性)降低全因死亡率;非甾体类盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂,迄今为止仅在慢性肾脏病患者中用非奈利酮进行了测试,可能降低死亡率(0.89,0.79 至 1.00;中等确定性);其他药物可能不会。该研究证实了 SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂在降低心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、心力衰竭住院和终末期肾病方面的获益。非奈利酮可能降低心力衰竭和终末期肾病的住院率,并可能降低心血管死亡。只有 GLP-1 受体激动剂可降低非致死性中风;SGLT-2 抑制剂在降低终末期肾病方面优于其他药物。GLP-1 受体激动剂和可能 SGLT-2 抑制剂和替西帕肽改善生活质量。报告的危害在很大程度上是特定于药物类别的(例如,SGLT-2 抑制剂引起的生殖器感染,替西帕肽和 GLP-1 受体激动剂引起的严重胃肠道不良事件,非奈利酮导致的高钾血症住院)。替西帕肽可能导致体重减轻幅度最大(平均差异-8.57kg;中等确定性)。基础胰岛素(平均差异 2.15kg;中等确定性)和噻唑烷二酮类药物(平均差异 2.81kg;中等确定性)可能导致体重增加幅度最大。SGLT-2 抑制剂、GLP-1 受体激动剂和非奈利酮在 2 型糖尿病患者中的绝对获益因心血管和肾脏结局的基线风险而异(https://matchit.magicevidence.org/230125dist-diabetes)。

结论

本网络荟萃分析通过添加非奈利酮和替西帕肽的信息,除了确认 SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂在降低不良心血管和肾脏结局及死亡方面的显著获益之外,扩展了知识。这些发现强调需要不断评估科学进展,以在 2 型糖尿病患者的临床实践指南中引入最新的更新。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42022325948。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6f/10077111/0203de3a87a6/shiq074068.f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验