Aleksova Jasna, Ebeling Peter
Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2025 Aug;55(8):1232-1241. doi: 10.1111/imj.70061. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
Osteoporosis is a national health priority, and over six million Australians over the age of 50 years have poor bone health. Fragility fractures due to osteoporosis are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality risk and a high economic cost to the community. It is a chronic condition requiring long-term management. Despite notable advances in pharmacotherapy, large treatment gaps remain. Antiresorptive drugs have been the foundation of treatment; however, their efficacy wanes and rare adverse effects accumulate with prolonged use. Osteoanabolic drugs form new bone and can also restore deteriorated bone microarchitecture, in addition to increasing bone mineral density. Currently, antiresorptive drugs are used as first-line drugs for osteoporosis. However, recent studies have highlighted the superiority of anabolic drugs for fracture reduction over antiresorptives. Furthermore, for patients at very high risk or imminent risk of fracture, the use of sequential therapy with an osteoanabolic medication followed by an antiresorptive is superior to achieving optimal long-term bone health outcomes. This article will discuss the evidence supporting the anti-fracture benefits of osteoanabolic drugs, emphasising their benefits as first-line agents for osteoporosis. Challenges surrounding transitions between osteoanabolic and antiresorptive medications are also discussed, highlighting considerations for the optimal treatment sequence with a focus on recent updates to Australian prescribing recommendations and PBS requirements.
骨质疏松症是国家卫生工作重点,超过600万50岁以上的澳大利亚人骨骼健康状况不佳。骨质疏松导致的脆性骨折与发病率和死亡率风险增加以及社会的高额经济成本相关。这是一种需要长期管理的慢性疾病。尽管药物治疗取得了显著进展,但仍存在较大的治疗差距。抗吸收药物一直是治疗的基础;然而,随着长期使用,它们的疗效会减弱,罕见的不良反应会累积。骨合成代谢药物除了增加骨矿物质密度外,还能形成新骨并恢复恶化的骨微结构。目前,抗吸收药物被用作骨质疏松症的一线药物。然而,最近的研究强调了合成代谢药物在减少骨折方面优于抗吸收药物。此外,对于骨折风险非常高或即将发生骨折的患者,使用骨合成代谢药物序贯抗吸收药物治疗优于实现最佳长期骨骼健康结果。本文将讨论支持骨合成代谢药物抗骨折益处的证据,强调其作为骨质疏松症一线药物的益处。还讨论了骨合成代谢药物和抗吸收药物之间转换的相关挑战,重点关注澳大利亚处方建议和药品福利计划(PBS)要求的最新更新,突出了最佳治疗顺序的考虑因素。