Li Chao, Diao Yong-Kang, Li Yi-Fan, Lv Shao-Dong, Wang Xian-Ming, Wang Xue-Dong, Zheng Qi-Xuan, Wang Hong, Liu Han, Lin Kong-Ying, Liang Ying-Jian, Zhou Ya-Hao, Gu Wei-Min, Wang Ming-Da, Yao Lan-Qing, Xu Xin-Fei, Xu Jia-Hao, Gu Li-Hui, Pawlik Timothy M, Shen Feng, Yang Tian
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf041.
The Milan criteria and the French α-fetoprotein (AFP) model have both been validated for predicting outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, with the Milan criteria also used for predicting outcomes after hepatic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AFP model's predictive value for recurrence and survival following hepatocellular carcinoma resection and compare its performance with that of the Milan criteria.
Data for patients who underwent hepatocellular carcinoma resection between 2002 and 2021 were analysed. For both the AFP model and Milan criteria, patients were divided into two groups: those with hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the AFP model (scores ≤ 2 and > 2 points, respectively) and the Milan criteria. Cumulative recurrence and overall survival rates were compared between patients within and beyond the AFP model. Predictions of recurrence and overall survival by the AFP model and Milan criteria were compared using net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.
Among 1968 patients evaluated, 1058 (53.8%) and 940 (47.8%) were classified as beyond on the AFP model and Milan criteria, respectively. After controlling for competing factors on multivariable analyses, being beyond the AFP model was independently associated with recurrence and worse overall survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Time-dependent net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that the AFP model was superior to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence. Of note, patients who were classified as beyond both the Milan criteria and AFP model had an even higher risk of postoperative recurrence and mortality (hazard ratios 1.51 and 1.47, respectively).
The French AFP model demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence and survival after hepatocellular carcinoma resection. The AFP model not only effectively stratified patient risk but also identified a subgroup of high-risk patients among those beyond the Milan criteria.
米兰标准和法国甲胎蛋白(AFP)模型均已被验证可用于预测肝细胞癌肝移植后的预后,米兰标准也用于预测肝切除术后的预后。本研究的目的是评估AFP模型对肝细胞癌切除术后复发和生存的预测价值,并将其性能与米兰标准进行比较。
分析2002年至2021年间接受肝细胞癌切除术患者的数据。对于AFP模型和米兰标准,患者均分为两组:AFP模型内和模型外(评分分别≤2分和>2分)以及米兰标准内和标准外的肝细胞癌患者。比较AFP模型内和模型外患者的累积复发率和总生存率。使用净重新分类改善和受试者操作特征曲线下面积分析比较AFP模型和米兰标准对复发和总生存的预测。
在1968例评估患者中,分别有1058例(53.8%)和940例(47.8%)被分类为AFP模型外和米兰标准外。在多变量分析中控制竞争因素后,AFP模型外与肝细胞癌切除术后的复发和更差的总生存独立相关。时间依赖性净重新分类改善和受试者操作特征曲线下面积分析表明,AFP模型在预测复发方面优于米兰标准。值得注意的是,被分类为米兰标准和AFP模型均外的患者术后复发和死亡风险更高(风险比分别为1.51和1.47)。
法国AFP模型在预测肝细胞癌切除术后的复发和生存方面显示出比米兰标准更高的预后准确性。AFP模型不仅有效地对患者风险进行了分层,还在米兰标准外的患者中识别出了一个高风险亚组。