Liu Haiyan, Xia Yi, Hua Lingling, Sun Hao, Yan Rui, Yao Zhijian, Qin Jiaolong
Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jun;186:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.057. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
Distinguishing between unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar disorder (BD) during periods of remission presents a significant clinical challenge. To mitigate the potential confounding effects of depressive episodes, our study compares the white matter networks of individuals with UD and BD in remission, aiming to explore the differentiation between these two affective disorders. Our cohort included 69 individuals with remitted UD, 55 with remitted BD, and 78 healthy controls (HC). We employed diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to assess the white matter (WM) network. Additionally, we utilized a comprehensive set of connectome and five communication models to characterize the alterations within the whole-brain WM network. Compared to HC, both UD and BD patients showed reduced connectivity in the frontal orbital region, with BD patients exhibiting a more pronounced decrease. BD patients demonstrated superior navigation ability and higher shortest path metric values in key brain region connections compared to UD. Conversely, UD patients showed greater diffusion efficiency in certain brain regions. Communicability and search information analyses revealed distinct patterns of connectivity between the two patient groups, with potential implications for emotion regulation and information processing. Our findings highlight distinct brain connectivity patterns in BD and UD during remission, suggesting that these patterns could serve as neuroimaging biomarkers for differentiating between the two disorders. The study provides insights into the enduring effects of mood disorders on brain connectivity and has potential clinical implications for diagnosis and treatment.
在缓解期区分单相抑郁(UD)和双相情感障碍(BD)是一项重大的临床挑战。为了减轻抑郁发作的潜在混杂影响,我们的研究比较了缓解期UD和BD患者的白质网络,旨在探索这两种情感障碍之间的差异。我们的队列包括69名缓解期UD患者、55名缓解期BD患者和78名健康对照(HC)。我们采用扩散张量成像(DTI)来评估白质(WM)网络。此外,我们利用了一套全面的连接组和五种通信模型来表征全脑WM网络内的变化。与HC相比,UD和BD患者在眶额区域的连接性均降低,BD患者的降低更为明显。与UD患者相比,BD患者在关键脑区连接中表现出更好的导航能力和更高的最短路径度量值。相反,UD患者在某些脑区表现出更高的扩散效率。可通信性和搜索信息分析揭示了两组患者之间不同的连接模式,这可能对情绪调节和信息处理产生影响。我们的研究结果突出了缓解期BD和UD患者不同的脑连接模式,表明这些模式可作为区分这两种疾病的神经影像学生物标志物。该研究为情绪障碍对脑连接性的持久影响提供了见解,并对诊断和治疗具有潜在的临床意义。