• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种化学机械去龋剂在乳牙中的临床性能:一项随机对照试验

Clinical performance of two chemomechanical caries removal agents in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Maashi M, Elkhodary H, Bamashmous N, Felemban O, Alamoudi N

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80200, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01030-9.

DOI:10.1007/s40368-025-01030-9
PMID:40205159
Abstract

PURPOSE

The concept of Chemomechanical Caries Removal (CMCR) includes the selective removal of caries-infected tissue while preserving caries-affected tissue. However, studies examining its application to children are scarce. The aim was to assess pain perception and time duration of CMCR agents when removing caries in primary molars in a sample of children compared to the conventional method of caries removal using rotary burs.

METHODS

A randomized controlled clinical trial with a split-mouth design with a sample of 60 children aged 4-9 years with 120 cavitated occlusal carious primary molars was equally distributed into 2 experiments: BRIX3000 vs. conventional method (Experiment 1) and Carie-Care™ vs. conventional method (Experiment 2). The time duration of caries removal was recorded. Perception of pain during caries excavation was evaluated using the "Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale."

RESULTS

Caries removal using the conventional method was significantly faster compared to CMCR agents in both experiments (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Caries removal using BRIX3000 was significantly faster than Carie-Care™ (P < 0.001). Caries removal with BRIX3000 or Carie-Care™ were reported less painful than the conventional method (P = 0.002 and P = 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that although CMCR methods require more time for caries removal, they were reported to be less painful.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov under the identifier NCT05427591.

摘要

目的

化学机械性龋损去除(CMCR)的概念包括在保留受龋影响组织的同时选择性去除感染龋的组织。然而,研究其在儿童中的应用的研究很少。目的是评估与使用旋转车针的传统龋损去除方法相比,CMCR制剂在去除儿童样本中乳磨牙龋损时的疼痛感知和持续时间。

方法

一项采用口内对照设计的随机对照临床试验,样本为60名4至9岁的儿童,有120颗咬合面龋坏的乳磨牙,平均分为2个试验:BRIX3000与传统方法(试验1)以及Carie-Care™与传统方法(试验2)。记录龋损去除的持续时间。使用“面部表情疼痛评分量表”评估龋洞预备过程中的疼痛感知。

结果

在两个试验中,使用传统方法去除龋损均明显比CMCR制剂更快(P < 0.001和P < 0.001)。使用BRIX3000去除龋损明显比Carie-Care™更快(P < 0.001)。据报告,使用BRIX3000或Carie-Care™去除龋损比传统方法疼痛程度更低(分别为P = 0.002和P = 0.011)。

结论

该研究得出结论,虽然CMCR方法去除龋损需要更多时间,但据报告其疼痛程度更低。

试验注册

该研究方案已在www.CLINICALTRIALS.gov上注册,标识符为NCT05427591。

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of two chemomechanical caries removal agents in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.两种化学机械去龋剂在乳牙中的临床性能:一项随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01030-9.
2
Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000 and Carisolv in chemomechanical caries removal in immature permanent first molars: a randomized controlled trial.BRIX3000与Carisolv用于年轻恒牙第一恒磨牙化学机械去龋的比较评估:一项随机对照试验
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06319-1.
3
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.乳牙龋齿的预成冠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.
4
Comparison of smart burs and chemo-mechanical caries removal systems in primary molars - A systematic review and meta-analysis.乳牙中智能牙钻与化学机械去龋系统的比较——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024 Oct 1;42(4):257-266. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_308_24. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
5
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.治疗龋坏或牙本质龋损的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2.
6
WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.撤回:用于治疗乳牙龋齿的牙科填充物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub3.
7
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.用于治疗乳牙龋齿的补牙材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub2.
8
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.非创伤性修复治疗与传统修复治疗在龋病管理中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD008072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008072.pub2.
9
Evaluation of Papacarie®, Carie-Care™, BRIX3000™ and conventional hand instrumentation for caries removal in primary teeth: a randomized control study.评价 Papacarie®、Carie-Care™、BRIX3000™ 和传统手动器械在乳牙龋齿去除中的效果:一项随机对照研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;48(3):131-138. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.066. Epub 2024 May 3.
10
Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacological Properties and Health Benefits of Eugenol: A Comprehensive Review.丁香酚的药理学特性和健康益处:全面综述。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021 Aug 3;2021:2497354. doi: 10.1155/2021/2497354. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.比较两种化学机械去龋剂(2.25%次氯酸钠凝胶和 brix3000)在去龋和患者合作方面的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2020 Feb;93:103280. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103280. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
3
A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12-15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial.
12至15岁儿童恒牙使用龋齿关爱凝胶进行化学机械去龋与传统钻孔方法临床效果的比较研究:一项随机对照试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):42-46.
4
Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An study.使用聚合物车针与化学机械去龋剂去除龋坏组织的疗效比较:一项临床和微生物学评估——一项研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;35(1):6-13. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.199232.
5
Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: A comparative in vivo study.临床及社区环境下化学机械去龋法与机械去龋法的比较:一项体内对照研究
Eur J Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):386-391. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.184151.
6
A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children.儿童龋齿不同去除方法的比较临床研究
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Feb;16(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s40368-014-0140-1. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
7
Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods.化学机械去龋方法的当前进展
Aust Dent J. 2014 Dec;59(4):446-56; quiz 525. doi: 10.1111/adj.12214. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
8
Evaluation of three different caries removal techniques in children: a comparative clinical study.儿童三种不同龋病去除技术的评估:一项对比临床研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Fall;38(1):23-6. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.1.p3324121m66n1737.
9
Chemomechanical Caries Removal: A Review & Study of an Indigen-ously Developed Agent (Carie Care (TM) Gel) In Children.化学机械去龋:对一种自主研发的制剂(龋齿护理(商标)凝胶)在儿童中的应用回顾与研究
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Aug;5(4):84-90. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
10
Comparison of the efficacy of chemicomechanical caries removal with conventional methods - a clinical study.化学机械去龋与传统方法疗效的比较——一项临床研究
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):42-7. Epub 2013 Jun 23.