Suppr超能文献

比较两种化学机械去龋剂(2.25%次氯酸钠凝胶和 brix3000)在去龋和患者合作方面的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。

Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.

Department of Oral Rehabilitation. Medical University of South Carolina, James B. Edwards College of Dental Medicine, Charleston, SC USA.

出版信息

J Dent. 2020 Feb;93:103280. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103280. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study compared and evaluated the effectiveness of Brix 3000 and 2.25 % sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) gel with conventional rotary instrumentation method in caries excavation of primary molars. The null hypothesis: no difference between the two tested chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents used in this trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted with 32 children suffering from proximal caries of primary maxillary molars, age ranging between 6 and 9 years old. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups: Brix 3000, NaOCl gel, and conventional with 10, 12, and 10 teeth in each group, respectively. After isolation of selected teeth, either CMCR agent were applied for two minutes. The application was repeated as needed until a caries-free surface was obtained. The conventional group used low-speed burs to excavate all carious lesions. The time required to obtain a caries-free result for each testing method was recorded. Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale was used to assess the acceptance of the technique used by the child.

RESULTS

Conventional treatment required significantly less time for caries removal compared to Brix 3000 (P = .002) and NaOCl gel (P = .000). No significant difference observed between Brix 3000 and NaOCl gel (P = .679). Statistically higher pain scores were observed with conventional treatment compared to both Brix 3000 (P = .000) and NaOCl gel (P = .005). Pain scores were lower with Brix 3000, and NaOCl gel with no significant difference observed between the CMCR agents (p = .690).

CONCLUSIONS

CMCR agents that are effective in removing the carious dentine of primary teeth without negatively affecting the cooperation of children.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of a 2.25 % sodium hypochlorite gel can be an effective and well-tolerated method of removing decay from primary teeth and reduce the trauma associated with conventional rotary caries removal.

摘要

引言

本研究比较和评估了 Brix 3000 与 2.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)凝胶在乳磨牙龋蚀清除中的效果,与传统旋转器械方法进行比较。零假设:两种测试的化学机械去龋(CMCR)剂之间没有差异。

材料与方法

这是一项随机对照临床试验,纳入了 32 名患有上颌乳磨牙近中龋的儿童,年龄在 6 至 9 岁之间。受试者随机分为三组:Brix 3000 组、NaOCl 凝胶组和传统组,每组分别有 10、12 和 10 颗牙齿。在隔离选定的牙齿后,应用 CMCR 剂两分钟。根据需要重复应用,直到获得无龋损的表面。传统组使用低速车针挖掘所有龋损病变。记录每种测试方法获得无龋损结果所需的时间。Wong-Baker FACES 疼痛评分量表用于评估儿童对所用技术的接受程度。

结果

与 Brix 3000(P=0.002)和 NaOCl 凝胶(P=0.000)相比,传统治疗方法去除龋损所需的时间明显更短。Brix 3000 与 NaOCl 凝胶之间无显著差异(P=0.679)。与传统治疗相比,Brix 3000 和 NaOCl 凝胶的疼痛评分均较低,但无显著差异(P=0.690)。

结论

CMCR 剂可有效去除乳磨牙的龋损牙本质,同时不会影响儿童的合作。

临床意义

使用 2.25%次氯酸钠凝胶可以是一种有效且耐受良好的方法,可从乳磨牙中去除腐坏物质,并减少与传统旋转器械去龋相关的创伤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验