Minarik Jiri, Pour Ludek, Latal Vojtech, Jelinek Tomas, Straub Jan, Jungova Alexandra, Radocha Jakub, Pavlicek Petr, Stork Martin, Pika Tomas, Krhovska Petra, Popkova Tereza, Sedlak Frantisek, Spicka Ivan, Jindra Pavel, Capounova Vladimira, Maisnar Vladimir, Hajek Roman
Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14087-y.
Despite significant advancements in therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) over the past 20 years, most patients experience relapse, necessitating new treatment approaches. This study aims to compare the real-world effectiveness of lenalidomide (LEN)-based triplet therapies, specifically daratumumab (DRD), carfilzomib (KRD), and ixazomib (IRD), in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).A retrospective registry-based study analyzed 538 RRMM patients undergoing therapy for their first to third relapse. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), with a matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) employed to address cohort differences.ORR was highest for DRD at 91.4%, followed by KRD (89.6%) and IRD cohorts (Early-IRD: 79.6%, Late-IRD: 70.8%). Median PFS for DRD was greater at 23.64 months compared to KRD (16.52 months) and IRD groups (Early-IRD: 19.97 months, Late-IRD: 11.57 months). The MAIC confirmed better outcomes for the DRD regimen. High-risk features were not overcome by any of the LEN-based regimens.The findings underscore the superior efficacy of DRD in achieving sustained responses in RRMM patients. The composition of the cohort is a crucial factor, extending beyond selection criteria. This study highlights the importance of real-world evidence in assessing treatment modalities in clinical settings.
尽管在过去20年里多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的治疗取得了显著进展,但大多数患者仍会复发,因此需要新的治疗方法。本研究旨在比较来那度胺(LEN)为基础的三联疗法,即达雷妥尤单抗(DRD)、卡非佐米(KRD)和伊沙佐米(IRD),在复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)中的真实世界疗效。一项基于回顾性登记的研究分析了538例接受首次至第三次复发治疗的RRMM患者。主要终点为总缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),采用匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)来解决队列差异问题。DRD组的ORR最高,为91.4%,其次是KRD组(89.6%)和IRD组(早期IRD组:79.6%,晚期IRD组:70.8%)。DRD组的中位PFS更长,为23.64个月,而KRD组为16.52个月,IRD组(早期IRD组:19.97个月,晚期IRD组:11.57个月)。MAIC证实DRD方案的疗效更好。基于LEN的任何方案都无法克服高危特征。这些发现强调了DRD在RRMM患者中实现持续缓解方面的卓越疗效。队列组成是一个关键因素,其影响超出了选择标准。本研究强调了真实世界证据在临床环境中评估治疗方式的重要性。