Al-Oleiw Yassir, Demir Daghan, Josefsson Axel
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Apr 30;31(2):199-209. doi: 10.5056/jnm23104.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ineffective esophageal motility is the most frequent disorder of esophageal peristalsis. Symptoms may include dysphagia, chest pain, and heartburn. Our aims are to evaluate the long-term prognosis and determine if provocative tests during high-resolution esophageal manometry could predict the prognosis.
We retrospectively assessed high resolution manometries performed between 2015-2018 in adult patients. Symptoms were evaluated at baseline and at follow-up (median 39 months later) using the impact dysphagia questionnaire (IDQ-10), where a score ≥ 7 defined dysphagia, the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ), where a score ≥ 9 defined symptoms of reflux disease and if the subject had chest pain ≥ once a week. Chicago classifications version 3.0 and 4.0 were used. The contractile reserve was assessed by identifying whether esophageal peristalsis normalized or not on solid bolus swallows and a rapid drink challenge was included.
Nine hundred and eighty investigations performed during the study period; 114 patients (11.6%) were identified with ineffective esophageal motility. The final study cohort consisted of 33 patients of which 42% had dysphagia at follow-up and 25% had chest pain at least once a week, 46% had reflux symptoms. Patients who normalized motility on solid bolus swallows reported less dysphagia upon follow-up ( = 0.012), nevertheless reported similar proportions of chest pain ( = 0.632), and reflux ( = 0.514). There were no associations between having dysphagia, chest pain, or reflux at follow-up, and abnormal findings on the rapid drink challenge ( > 0.05 for all).
Patients with ineffective esophageal motility continue to experience long-term esophageal symptoms at follow-up. Provocative tests seem to have the potential to partly predict the long-term prognosis of dysphagia.
背景/目的:食管动力障碍是食管蠕动最常见的疾病。症状可能包括吞咽困难、胸痛和烧心。我们的目的是评估其长期预后,并确定高分辨率食管测压期间的激发试验是否可预测预后。
我们回顾性评估了2015年至2018年期间对成年患者进行的高分辨率测压。在基线和随访时(中位时间为39个月后)使用吞咽困难影响问卷(IDQ-10)评估症状,其中评分≥7定义为吞咽困难;使用胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ),其中评分≥9定义为反流病症状,以及受试者是否每周至少出现一次胸痛。采用芝加哥分类第3.0版和第4.0版。通过确定固体团块吞咽时食管蠕动是否恢复正常来评估收缩储备,并纳入快速饮水激发试验。
研究期间共进行了980次检查;114例患者(11.6%)被诊断为食管动力障碍。最终研究队列包括33例患者,其中42%在随访时有吞咽困难,25%每周至少有一次胸痛,46%有反流症状。固体团块吞咽时蠕动恢复正常的患者在随访时报告的吞咽困难较少(P = 0.012),但胸痛(P = 0.632)和反流(P = 0.514)的比例相似。随访时出现吞咽困难、胸痛或反流与快速饮水激发试验的异常结果之间无关联(所有P>0.05)。
食管动力障碍患者在随访时仍有长期的食管症状。激发试验似乎有可能部分预测吞咽困难的长期预后。