Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;115(3):367-375. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000536.
Symptoms are inconsistently associated with esophageal motor findings on high-resolution manometry (HRM). We aimed to evaluate predictors of dysphagia severity, including esophageal hypervigilance and visceral anxiety, among patients evaluated with HRM.
Adult patients undergoing HRM at 4 academic medical centers (United States and France) were prospectively evaluated. HRM was completed and analyzed per the Chicago Classification v3.0. Validated symptom scores, including the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire and Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale, were completed at the time of HRM.
Two hundred thirty-six patients, aged 18-85 (mean 53) years, 65% female, were included. Approximately 59 (25%) patients had a major motor disorder on HRM: 19 achalasia, 24 esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, 12 absent contractility, and 4 jackhammer. Approximately 177 (75%) patients did not have a major motor disorder: 71 ineffective esophageal motility and 106 normal motility. Having a major motor disorder was a significant predictor of dysphagia severity (Radj = 0.049, P < 0.001), but the Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale score carried a predictive relationship of Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire that was 2-fold higher than having a major motor disorder: Radj = 0.118 (P < 0.001). This finding remained when evaluated by the major motor disorder group. HRM metrics were nonsignificant.
In a prospective, international multicenter study, we found that esophageal hypervigilance and visceral anxiety were the strongest predictors of dysphagia severity among patients evaluated with HRM. Thus, an assessment of esophageal hypervigilance and visceral anxiety is important to incorporate when evaluating symptom severity in clinical practice and research studies.
症状与高分辨率测压(HRM)的食管动力表现不一致。我们旨在评估 HRM 评估患者的吞咽困难严重程度的预测因素,包括食管过度敏感和内脏焦虑。
在美国和法国的 4 个学术医疗中心前瞻性评估接受 HRM 的成年患者。按照芝加哥分类第 3.0 版完成并分析 HRM。在进行 HRM 的同时完成了经过验证的症状评分,包括简短食管吞咽困难问卷和食管过度敏感和焦虑量表。
共纳入 236 名年龄 18-85 岁(平均 53 岁)的患者,其中女性占 65%。大约 59 例(25%)患者在 HRM 上存在主要运动障碍:19 例贲门失弛缓症,24 例食管胃连接部流出道梗阻,12 例无收缩力,4 例食管剧烈蠕动。大约 177 例(75%)患者无主要运动障碍:71 例无效食管动力,106 例正常动力。存在主要运动障碍是吞咽困难严重程度的显著预测因素(Radj=0.049,P<0.001),但食管过度敏感和焦虑量表评分与 Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire 具有两倍的预测关系,高于存在主要运动障碍(Radj=0.118,P<0.001)。在评估主要运动障碍组时,这一发现仍然存在。HRM 指标无统计学意义。
在一项前瞻性、国际多中心研究中,我们发现食管过度敏感和内脏焦虑是 HRM 评估患者吞咽困难严重程度的最强预测因素。因此,在临床实践和研究中评估症状严重程度时,评估食管过度敏感和内脏焦虑非常重要。