Johansson David, Skillmark Mikael, Allgurin Monika
Department for Social Work, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;16:1574303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574303. eCollection 2025.
Wellbeing, encompassing hedonic and/or eudaimonic components, provides a two-dimensional framework for evaluating the effects of psychosocial interventions for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study investigates how this conceptualization of wellbeing is reflected in existing research on psychosocial interventions for people with SMI. This is the first systematic review to assess the effects of psychosocial interventions on wellbeing as a purely positive phenomenon in this population. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024598954).
A systematic review was conducted on intervention studies involving adults with SMI receiving psychosocial interventions in an out-patient setting, with a control condition and a wellbeing outcome aligned with a wellbeing framework. Five databases were searched, supplemented by manual searches, yielding 2,842 potential studies. Due to considerable heterogeneity ( = 94%), interventions were analyzed independently, with results summarized based on the proportion of studies reporting significant effects. The study followed PRISMA guidelines.
Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one study (6%) provided a full rationale for using a wellbeing measure as the primary outcome. Over 70% reported a significant positive effect on wellbeing. In 13 studies effect size could be calculated, 29% in reference to all 17 studies demonstrated a positive effect (ranging from small to large). Clinical implications of the wellbeing construct were discussed in 47% of the studies, including an increased emphasis on positive functioning. Fewer than 50% received a high-quality rating, and only three studies reporting significant effects used Intention-To-Treat (ITT) data.
Research on two-dimensional wellbeing is a promising yet underprioritized field, providing a renewed focus on abilities and generating significant clinical implications. Wellbeing ought to be a prioritized outcome in out-patient treatment policies, but today no recommendation as to which interventions are most effective are possible due to insufficient data. The implications of detecting changes in wellbeing in individuals with SMI, along with recommendations for future research, are discussed.
幸福感包含享乐主义和/或自我实现的成分,为评估针对重度精神疾病(SMI)患者的心理社会干预效果提供了一个二维框架。本研究调查了幸福感的这种概念化如何在现有的关于SMI患者心理社会干预的研究中得到体现。这是第一项系统评价,旨在评估心理社会干预对该人群中作为纯粹积极现象的幸福感的影响。该研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42024598954)登记。
对涉及在门诊接受心理社会干预的成年SMI患者的干预研究进行系统评价,设置对照条件,并采用与幸福感框架一致的幸福感结局指标。检索了五个数据库,并辅以手工检索,共获得2842项潜在研究。由于异质性相当大(I² = 94%),对干预措施进行了独立分析,并根据报告有显著效果的研究比例总结结果。该研究遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。
17项研究符合纳入标准。只有一项研究(6%)提供了将幸福感测量作为主要结局指标的完整理由。超过70%的研究报告对幸福感有显著的积极影响。在13项研究中可以计算效应量,相对于所有17项研究,29%显示出积极影响(范围从小到 大)。47%的研究讨论了幸福感结构的临床意义,包括对积极功能的更多强调。不到50%的研究获得了高质量评级,只有三项报告有显著效果的研究使用了意向性分析(ITT)数据。
关于二维幸福感的研究是一个有前景但未得到充分重视的领域,它重新聚焦于能力,并产生了重要的临床意义。幸福感应该成为门诊治疗政策中的优先结局指标,但由于数据不足,目前无法就哪些干预措施最有效提出建议。本文讨论了检测SMI患者幸福感变化的意义以及对未来研究的建议。