Endo Keiichiro, Fukushima Kenji, Katahira Masataka, Kiko Takatoyo, Yamakuni Ryo, Ukon Naoyuki, Shimizu Takeshi, Ishii Shiro, Oikawa Masayoshi, Ito Hiroshi, Takeishi Yasuchika
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Hikarigaoka-1, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03387-w.
This study aimed to simultaneously evaluate the association between diastolic left ventricular (LV) inflow and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) using a hybrid PET/MR system in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
Sixty-seven patients (mean 66 ± 15 years, male 55) with CAD who underwent rest-pharmacological stress N-ammonia PET/MR were included. MFR, perfusion defect, and peak filling rate (PFR) were obtained through rest-stress PET. MR acquisition was performed simultaneously during the PET scan to obtain rest-stress 4D flow. Diastolic LV inflow volume (LVinf)(mL/s), peak velocity (peakV)(cm/s), and the change from the rest scan (Δvalue) were computed. Diastolic LV inflow parameters were compared based on the presence or absence of preserved MFR and perfusion defects.
In all patients, diastolic LV inflow parameters significantly increased in the stress scan compared to the rest (53.7 ± 23.1 vs. 64.1 ± 32.9 ml/s, p = 0.0002; 68.1 ± 15.1 vs. 76.4 ± 20.6 cm/s, p = 0.0001 for LVinf and peakV, respectively). PeakV and PFR showed a significant correlation for rest and stress (r = 0.4, p = 0.01; r = 0.3, p = 0.03 for rest and stress, respectively).ΔpeakV significantly correlated to stress MBF, and MFR (r = 0.3, p = 0.007; r = 0.3, p = 0.04 for stress MBF, and MFR, respectively). Among patients with preserved LVEF (n = 47), when were divided into 4 subgroups based on the median myocardial flow reserve (MFR, 1.86) and the presence of perfusion defect, ΔpeakV was significantly higher in those with MFR above median and without abnormal perfusion compared to the other groups (21.8 ± 13.6 vs. 13.5 ± 17.0, 13.0 ± 13.5, and 4.6 ± 19.1; p = 0.04, 0.04, and 0.04 for MFR ≥ 1.86 or < 1.86 with or without abnormal perfusion, respectively).
Non-invasive assessment of diastolic intra-LV hemodynamics derived from 4D flow MR demonstrated a significant association with coronary vasodilation.
本研究旨在使用混合正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MR)系统,同时评估冠心病(CAD)患者舒张期左心室(LV)流入与心肌血流储备(MFR)之间的关联。
纳入67例接受静息-药物负荷N-氨PET/MR检查的CAD患者(平均年龄66±15岁,男性55例)。通过静息-负荷PET获得MFR、灌注缺损和峰值充盈率(PFR)。在PET扫描期间同时进行MR采集,以获得静息-负荷4D血流。计算舒张期LV流入量(LVinf)(mL/s)、峰值速度(peakV)(cm/s)以及与静息扫描相比的变化(Δ值)。根据MFR和灌注缺损是否保留,比较舒张期LV流入参数。
在所有患者中,与静息状态相比,负荷扫描时舒张期LV流入参数显著增加(LVinf分别为53.7±23.1 vs. 64.1±32.9 ml/s,p = 0.0002;peakV分别为68.1±15.1 vs. 76.4±20.6 cm/s,p = 0.0001)。静息和负荷状态下,peakV与PFR均呈显著相关(静息时r = 0.4,p = 0.01;负荷时r = 0.3,p = 0.03)。ΔpeakV与负荷心肌血流量(MBF)和MFR显著相关(负荷MBF时r = 0.3,p = 0.007;MFR时r = 0.3,p = 0.04)。在左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留的患者(n = 47)中,根据心肌血流储备中位数(MFR,1.86)和灌注缺损情况分为4个亚组,与其他组相比,MFR高于中位数且无异常灌注的患者ΔpeakV显著更高(分别为21.8±13.6 vs. 13.5±17.0、13.0±13.5和4.6±19.1;MFR≥1.86或<1.86伴或不伴异常灌注时,p分别为0.04、0.04和0.04)。
通过4D血流MR对舒张期LV内血流动力学进行无创评估,显示与冠状动脉血管舒张存在显著关联。