• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织工程产品临床应用的标准化结局指标

Standardized Outcome Measures for the Clinical Application of Tissue Engineered Products.

作者信息

van den Bosch Anna S, Farkas Melinda, Kemme Frederique M, Stoop Matthea M, van Zuijlen Paul P M, Meij-de Vries Annebeth, Middelkoop Esther, Pijpe Anouk

机构信息

Alliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2922:335-354. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4510-9_26.

DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-4510-9_26
PMID:40208548
Abstract

The clinical application of tissue engineered products aims to regenerate skin and enhance the appearance, texture, sensation, and functionality of affected skin or scars. To evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of novel products, level 1 randomized controlled trials are required. However, currently a significant challenge in this field is the clinical and statistical heterogeneity of trial designs and outcome measures for tissue engineered products. To address this challenge and improve clinical outcomes, it is essential to standardize high-quality outcome measures. These measures are clinimetrically developed tools designed to reliably and validly assess specific health outcomes across diverse patient populations, clinical settings, and studies. This chapter proposes a core set of outcome measurements designed to evaluate the most relevant, feasible, reliable, and valid parameters in the clinical application of tissue engineered products. For routine clinical practice, we recommend the inclusion of photography, graft take, re-epithelialization, and scar quality assessment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. For clinical trials, additional measures such as colorimetry and elasticity assessment are advised. Detailed protocols for these methods are provided, resulting in a standardized core outcome set. High-quality outcome assessment also necessitates specialized training and the presence of trained personal at all assessment points. The chapter further addresses specific considerations for outcome assessment in pediatric patients, remote assessment strategies, and additional recommendations for optimizing clinical and research practices in this field. The implementation of standardized outcome measurement is essential for improving the outcomes of patients treated with tissue engineered products.

摘要

组织工程产品的临床应用旨在再生皮肤并改善受影响皮肤或疤痕的外观、质地、感觉和功能。为了评估新产品的疗效和有效性,需要进行一级随机对照试验。然而,目前该领域的一个重大挑战是组织工程产品试验设计和结果测量的临床和统计异质性。为应对这一挑战并改善临床结果,标准化高质量的结果测量至关重要。这些测量是通过临床测量学开发的工具,旨在可靠且有效地评估不同患者群体、临床环境和研究中的特定健康结果。本章提出了一组核心结果测量指标,旨在评估组织工程产品临床应用中最相关、可行、可靠和有效的参数。对于常规临床实践,我们建议采用摄影、移植物存活、再上皮化以及使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表进行疤痕质量评估。对于临床试验,建议采用比色法和弹性评估等额外测量方法。文中提供了这些方法的详细方案,从而形成了一个标准化的核心结果集。高质量的结果评估还需要专门培训以及在所有评估点配备经过培训的人员。本章还讨论了儿科患者结果评估的具体注意事项、远程评估策略以及优化该领域临床和研究实践的其他建议。实施标准化结果测量对于改善接受组织工程产品治疗患者的治疗效果至关重要。

相似文献

1
Standardized Outcome Measures for the Clinical Application of Tissue Engineered Products.组织工程产品临床应用的标准化结局指标
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2922:335-354. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4510-9_26.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
5
Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.瘢痕美观评估和分级(SCAR)量表作为术后瘢痕的一种结局测量工具,其可靠性和照片等效性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;153(1):55-60. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757.
6
Standardizing serial photography for assessing and monitoring vitiligo: A core set of international recommendations for essential clinical and technical specifications.标准化连续摄影评估和监测白癜风:评估和监测白癜风的基本临床和技术规范的国际核心建议。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Dec;83(6):1639-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.10.055. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Clinician-Reported Outcome Assessments of Treatment Benefit: Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcome Assessment Emerging Good Practices Task Force.治疗获益的临床医生报告结局评估:药物经济学与结局研究国际协会临床结局评估新兴良好实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.005. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
9
Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review.预防工作场所事故的安全干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 1;18(2):e1234. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1234. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective Burn Scar Assessment in Clinical Practice Using the Cutometer©: Introduction and Validation of a Standardized Measurement Protocol.临床应用 Cutometer©评估烧伤瘢痕:标准化测量方案的介绍与验证
J Burn Care Res. 2023 Jan 5;44(1):95-105. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac154.
2
Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale".使用Cutometer® MPA 580评估烧伤疤痕,并与“患者和观察者疤痕评估量表”及“温哥华疤痕量表”进行比较。
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Jun 13;39(4):516-526. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irx009.
3
Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.
术后瘢痕评定量表在康复中的测量学特性及临床应用:一项系统评价
Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Dec;38(4):279-86. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000134.
4
Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force.支持医疗产品标签的研究用儿科患者报告结局测评工具:ISPOR PRO 评估儿童和青少年实践良好研究报告工具专题组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):461-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.004.
5
The effect of probe to skin contact force on Cutometer MPA 580 measurements.探头与皮肤接触力对Cutometer MPA 580测量结果的影响。
J Med Eng Technol. 2013 Apr;37(3):208-12. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2013.779325.
6
Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue.客观颜色测量:三种设备在正常皮肤和瘢痕组织上的临床测量性能。
J Burn Care Res. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):e187-94. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318264bf7d.
7
A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.烧伤瘢痕评分量表用于临床和研究的质量的系统评价。
Burns. 2012 Feb;38(1):6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.COSMIN 研究就健康相关患者报告结局的测量属性的分类学、术语和定义达成了国际共识。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
9
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.当前评估人类瘢痕形成的量表:综述
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jun;62(6):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.080. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
10
Comparing the Vancouver Scar Scale with the cutometer in the assessment of donor site wounds treated with various dressings in a randomized trial.在一项随机试验中,比较温哥华瘢痕量表与皮肤弹性测定仪在评估使用各种敷料治疗的供皮区伤口方面的效果。
J Burn Care Res. 2006 May-Jun;27(3):345-51. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000216311.61266.00.