• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients Hospitalized With Skin and Soft Tissue Infection: The INSPIRE 3 Skin and Soft Tissue Randomized Clinical Trial.改善皮肤和软组织感染住院患者的经验性抗生素选择:INSPIRE 3皮肤和软组织随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0887.
2
Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients Hospitalized With Abdominal Infection: The INSPIRE 4 Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改善腹部感染住院患者的经验性抗生素选择:INSPIRE 4 集群随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1108.
3
Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Urinary Tract Infection: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial.促进改善尿路感染抗生素选择的管理策略:INSPIRE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 18;331(23):2018-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.6259.
4
Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Pneumonia: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial. stewardship 干预措施对肺炎抗生素选择的影响:INSPIRE 随机临床试验
JAMA. 2024 Jun 18;331(23):2007-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.6248.
5
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
6
Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults.成人坏死性软组织感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5(5):CD011680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011680.pub2.
7
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub3.
8
Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers.用于下肢静脉溃疡的抗生素和防腐剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 23(12):CD003557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003557.pub4.
9
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
10
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.用于哮喘加重期的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
R.I.S.E. ID: Adaptations to the Current Political Climate for the Infectious Diseases Frontline.R.I.S.E. 身份识别:针对传染病前线对当前政治气候的适应措施
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 25;12(8):ofaf443. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf443. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Initial Antibiotic Selection Strategy and Subsequent Antibiotic Use-Insights From the INSPIRE Trials.初始抗生素选择策略及后续抗生素使用——来自INSPIRE试验的见解
JAMA. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.11256.
3
Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients Hospitalized With Abdominal Infection: The INSPIRE 4 Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改善腹部感染住院患者的经验性抗生素选择:INSPIRE 4 集群随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1108.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients Hospitalized With Abdominal Infection: The INSPIRE 4 Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改善腹部感染住院患者的经验性抗生素选择:INSPIRE 4 集群随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1108.
2
When Can a MRSA Nares Swab Guide Antibiotic Stewardship?: What the Nose Knows.何时鼻拭子检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌可指导抗生素管理?鼻子知道什么。
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):230-231. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6436.
3
The Incidence of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the United States and Associated Healthcare Utilization Between 2010 and 2020.2010年至2020年美国皮肤和软组织感染的发病率及相关医疗保健利用情况
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 May 7;11(6):ofae267. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae267. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Pneumonia: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial. stewardship 干预措施对肺炎抗生素选择的影响:INSPIRE 随机临床试验
JAMA. 2024 Jun 18;331(23):2007-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.6248.
5
Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Urinary Tract Infection: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial.促进改善尿路感染抗生素选择的管理策略:INSPIRE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 18;331(23):2018-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.6259.
6
Racial and Ethnic Differences Among Adult Patients Hospitalized for Skin and Soft Tissue Infection: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 2012-2017 New York State Data.因皮肤和软组织感染住院的成年患者中的种族和民族差异:对2012 - 2017年纽约州数据的横断面分析
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2023 Nov;16(11):19-21.
7
Use of nares swab to de-escalate vancomycin for patients with suspected methicillin-resistant .对疑似耐甲氧西林患者使用鼻腔拭子来降阶梯使用万古霉素。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 9;3(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.444. eCollection 2023.
8
IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-related Foot Infections (IWGDF/IDSA 2023).国际糖尿病足工作组/美国感染病学会糖尿病相关足部感染诊断与治疗指南(国际糖尿病足工作组/美国感染病学会,2023年)
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad527.
9
Skin Pigmentation Impacts the Clinical Diagnosis of Wound Infection: Imaging of Bacterial Burden to Overcome Diagnostic Limitations.皮肤色素沉着影响伤口感染的临床诊断:细菌负荷成像以克服诊断局限性。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):1045-1055. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01584-8. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
10
Characterizing barriers to antibiotic stewardship for skin and soft-tissue infections in the emergency department using a systems engineering framework.使用系统工程框架描述急诊科皮肤和软组织感染抗生素管理的障碍
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 7;2(1):e180. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.316. eCollection 2022.

改善皮肤和软组织感染住院患者的经验性抗生素选择:INSPIRE 3皮肤和软组织随机临床试验

Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients Hospitalized With Skin and Soft Tissue Infection: The INSPIRE 3 Skin and Soft Tissue Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Gohil Shruti K, Septimus Edward, Kleinman Ken, Varma Neha, Sands Kenneth E, Avery Taliser R, Mauricio Amarah, Sljivo Selsebil, Rahm Risa, Roemer Kaleb, Cooper William S, McLean Laura E, Nickolay Naoise G, Poland Russell E, Weinstein Robert A, Fakhry Samir M, Guy Jeffrey, Moody Julia, Coady Micaela H, Smith Kim N, Meador Brittany, Froman Allison, Eibensteiner Katyuska, Hayden Mary K, Kubiak David W, Burks Chenette, Burgess L Hayley, Calderwood Michael S, Perlin Jonathan B, Platt Richard, Huang Susan S

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine.

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0887.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0887
PMID:40208610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11986828/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Empiric extended-spectrum antibiotics are routinely prescribed for patients hospitalized with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) despite low likelihoods of infection with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether computerized provider order entry (CPOE) prompts presenting patient-specific and pathogen-specific MDRO infection risk estimates could reduce empiric extended-spectrum antibiotics for noncritically ill patients admitted with SSTI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster randomized clinical trial included 92 hospitals and assessed the effect of an antibiotic stewardship bundle that included CPOE prompts vs routine stewardship on antibiotic selection during the first 3 hospital days (empiric period) in noncritically ill adults hospitalized with SSTI. The trial population included adults 18 years and older treated with empiric antibiotics for SSTI in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Data were collected from January 2019 to December 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

CPOE prompts recommending standard-spectrum antibiotics in patients prescribed extended-spectrum antibiotics during the empiric period when absolute risk of MDRO SSTI was estimated to be less than 10%, coupled with feedback and education.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was empiric extended-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy (summed number of different extended-spectrum antibiotics targeting Pseudomonas and/or MDR gram-negative bacteria received per patient each calendar day). The secondary outcome was antipseudomonal days of therapy. Safety outcomes included days to ICU transfer and hospital length of stay. Outcomes compared differences between baseline and intervention periods across strategies.

RESULTS

Among 118 562 patients admitted with SSTI at 92 hospitals, 67 033 (56.7%) were male and the mean (SD) age was 58.0 (17.5) years. A total of 57 837 patients were included in the baseline period and 60 725 in the intervention period. Receipt of any empiric extended-spectrum antibiotic during the baseline and intervention periods was 57.0% (16 855 of 29 595) and 56.0% (17 534 of 31 337), respectively, for the routine stewardship group compared with 55.4% (15 650 of 28 242) and 43.0% (12 647 of 29 388), respectively, for the CPOE group. Empiric extended-spectrum days of therapy per 1000 empiric days targeting Pseudomonas and/or MDR gram-negative pathogens was 511.5 during the baseline period and 488.7 during the intervention period in the routine stewardship group and was 496.2 and 359.1, respectively, in the CPOE bundle group (rate ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79; P < .001). There was no evidence of inferiority in the CPOE bundle group for mean (SD) hospital length of stay (routine stewardship, 6.5 [3.8] days; CPOE bundle, 6.4 [3.8] days) and days to ICU transfer (routine stewardship, 6.3 [3.2] days; CPOE bundle, 6.3 [3.1] days).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, CPOE prompts recommending standard-spectrum empiric antibiotics for low-risk patients hospitalized with SSTI coupled with education and feedback significantly reduced use of extended-spectrum antibiotics without increasing admissions to ICUs or hospital length of stay.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05423756.

摘要

重要性

对于因皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)住院的患者,尽管感染多重耐药菌(MDRO)的可能性较低,但仍常规开具经验性广谱抗生素。

目的

评估计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)提示呈现患者特异性和病原体特异性MDRO感染风险估计值是否可减少因SSTI入院的非重症患者的经验性广谱抗生素使用。

设计、设置和参与者:这项整群随机临床试验纳入了92家医院,评估了一种抗生素管理套餐的效果,该套餐包括CPOE提示与常规管理相比,对非重症SSTI住院成人患者住院前3天(经验期)抗生素选择的影响。试验人群包括18岁及以上在非重症监护病房(ICU)因SSTI接受经验性抗生素治疗的成年人。数据收集时间为2019年1月至2023年12月。

干预措施

当估计MDRO SSTI的绝对风险低于10%时,CPOE提示在经验期内向开具广谱抗生素的患者推荐标准谱抗生素,并提供反馈和教育。

主要结局和指标

主要结局是经验性广谱抗生素治疗天数(每位患者每个日历日接受的针对铜绿假单胞菌和/或多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌不同广谱抗生素的总数)。次要结局是抗假单胞菌治疗天数。安全性结局包括转入ICU的天数和住院时间。结局比较了不同策略下基线期和干预期之间的差异。

结果

在92家医院收治的118562例SSTI患者中,67033例(56.7%)为男性,平均(标准差)年龄为58.0(17.5)岁。基线期纳入57837例患者,干预期纳入60725例患者。常规管理组在基线期和干预期接受任何经验性广谱抗生素治疗的比例分别为57.0%(29595例中的16855例)和56.0%(31337例中的17534例),而CPOE组分别为55.4%(28242例中的15650例)和43.0%(29388例中的12647例)。常规管理组每1000个针对铜绿假单胞菌和/或多重耐药革兰氏阴性病原体的经验天数的经验性广谱治疗天数在基线期为511.5天,干预期为488.7天,CPOE套餐组分别为496.2天和359.1天(率比,0.72;95%CI,0.67 - 0.79;P <.001)。CPOE套餐组在平均(标准差)住院时间(常规管理,6.5 [3.8]天;CPOE套餐,6.4 [3.8]天)和转入ICU天数(常规管理,6.3 [3.2]天;CPOE套餐,6.3 [3.1]天)方面没有劣势证据。

结论和相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,CPOE提示为因SSTI住院的低风险患者推荐标准谱经验性抗生素,并提供教育和反馈,显著减少了广谱抗生素的使用,且未增加转入ICU的人数或住院时间。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05423756。