Lemma Tamene, Simma Eba Alemayehu, Rufael Tesfaye, Mekonnen Sileshi, Yewhalaw Delenasaw
Department of Biology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Animal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Vet Parasitol. 2025 Jun;336:110461. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110461. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
The study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % against Amblyomma cohaerens and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, and also to assess acaricide resistance using the Adult Immersion Test (AIT) in Jimma town, Oromia region, southwest Ethiopia. A total of 180 engorged adult female ticks of the two species (90 A. cohaerens and 90 R. decoloratus) were collected from local and crossbred cattle managed under extensive and semi-intensive systems. The ticks were immersed in amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % at field-recommended concentrations, and in distilled water for the control groups, for two minutes. Afterward, they were placed in an incubator at 27°C and 85 % RH for seven days. The oviposition responses of A. cohaerens and R. decoloratus were monitored regularly. The efficacy of each acaricide was assessed by comparing the mean egg mass laid by treated and untreated tick groups. The study results showed that ticks treated with amitraz 12.5 % died and did not lay eggs, while some ticks treated with diazinon 60 % survived and laid eggs after a seven-day incubation period. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the two acaricides in controlling egg-laying in both species of ticks. The ticks in the control group that were treated with water survived and laid eggs. Amitraz 12.5 % at the field-recommended concentration achieved 100 % control, whereas diazinon 60 % achieved 91.3 % control. The study shows that both amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % significantly reduced egg laying in A. cohaerens and R. decoloratus ticks. The results also demonstrate that amitraz 12.5 % is more effective in controlling ticks and that there is a sign of emerging resistance of ticks to diazinon 60 %.
本研究旨在评估12.5%双甲脒和60%二嗪农对埃塞俄比亚西南部奥罗米亚州吉马镇的粘连花蜱和无色牛蜱的体外药效,并使用成虫浸泡试验(AIT)评估杀螨剂抗性。从粗放和半集约管理系统下的本地牛和杂交牛身上总共收集了180只饱血的成年雌性蜱(90只粘连花蜱和90只无色牛蜱)。将蜱浸泡在田间推荐浓度的12.5%双甲脒和60%二嗪农中,对照组浸泡在蒸馏水中,浸泡两分钟。之后,将它们置于27°C和85%相对湿度的培养箱中7天。定期监测粘连花蜱和无色牛蜱的产卵反应。通过比较处理组和未处理组蜱产的平均卵块来评估每种杀螨剂的药效。研究结果表明,用12.5%双甲脒处理的蜱死亡且不产卵,而用60%二嗪农处理的一些蜱在7天的潜伏期后存活并产卵。两种杀螨剂在控制两种蜱产卵方面存在显著差异(p<0.05)。用水处理的对照组蜱存活并产卵。田间推荐浓度的12.5%双甲脒实现了100%的防治效果,而60%二嗪农实现了91.3%的防治效果。该研究表明,12.5%双甲脒和60%二嗪农均能显著减少粘连花蜱和无色牛蜱的产卵。结果还表明,12.5%双甲脒在控制蜱方面更有效,并且有迹象表明蜱对60%二嗪农产生了抗性。