Gomes Fernando Cotrim, Larcipretti Anna Laura Lima, Udoma-Udofa Ofonime Chantal, Rocha Bárbara Alves de Abreu, Mota Maria Eduarda Bezerra, Decina Mateus Machado, Haddad Júlia Oliveira Dabien, Bannach Matheus de Andrade, Pacheco-Barrios Niels, Rolston John D
Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
School of Medicine, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
Seizure. 2025 Jul;129:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2025.04.001. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
Invasive monitoring for epilepsy surgery is critical for localizing epileptogenic zones. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrodes (SDE) are two primary techniques used for this purpose. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of SEEG and SDE regarding various clinical outcomes in patients undergoing invasive epilepsy monitoring.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing SEEG and SDE for invasive epilepsy monitoring. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment through Cochrane's ROBINS-I tool independently. Statistical analyses were conducted using a random-effects model in R Studio.
A total of 16 studies involving 3751 patients were included in the analysis, with 1750 who underwent SDE and 2001 in the SEEG group. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding seizure freedom at last follow-up (OR 1.05; 95 % CI 0.61-1.81; I2 = 56 %; p = 0.86). The SEEG group, however, was associated with lower incidence of complications (OR 0.50; 95 %CI 0.28, 0.91; I 74 %; p < 0.01), fewer major bleeding events (OR 0.23; 95 %CI 0.11, 0.49; I 0 %; p < 0.01), fewer post-operative neurological deficits (OR 0.39; 95 %CI 0.21, 0.73; I 23 %; p < 0.05), and shorter operative time (MD -76.28 min; 95 %CI -101.86, -50.70; I 92 %; p < 0.05).
SEEG and SDE are both effective in achieving seizure freedom for drug-resistant epilepsy patients undergoing invasive monitoring. SEEG may offer advantages in terms of safety and healthcare utilization, with fewer complications and shorter operative times. These findings support the growing adoption of SEEG as a preferred method for epilepsy surgery, though further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.
癫痫手术的侵入性监测对于定位致痫区至关重要。立体定向脑电图(SEEG)和硬膜下电极(SDE)是用于此目的的两种主要技术。本荟萃分析旨在比较SEEG和SDE在接受侵入性癫痫监测的患者中各种临床结局的有效性和安全性。
我们对比较SEEG和SDE用于侵入性癫痫监测的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索相关研究。两名评价者通过Cochrane的ROBINS-I工具独立进行数据提取和质量评估。使用R Studio中的随机效应模型进行统计分析。
共有16项研究涉及3751例患者纳入分析,其中1750例接受SDE,2001例在SEEG组。末次随访时两组在无癫痫发作方面无统计学显著差异(OR 1.05;95%CI 0.61-1.81;I² = 56%;p = 0.86)。然而,SEEG组并发症发生率较低(OR 0.50;95%CI 0.28,0.91;I² 74%;p < 0.01),重大出血事件较少(OR 0.23;95%CI 0.11,0.49;I² 0%;p < 0.01),术后神经功能缺损较少(OR 0.39;95%CI 0.21,0.73;I² 23%;p < 0.05),手术时间较短(MD -76.28分钟;95%CI -101.86,-50.70;I² 92%;p < 0.05)。
SEEG和SDE对于接受侵入性监测的耐药癫痫患者实现无癫痫发作均有效。SEEG在安全性和医疗资源利用方面可能具有优势,并发症较少且手术时间较短。这些发现支持越来越多地采用SEEG作为癫痫手术的首选方法,不过需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些结果。