Li Danyu, Zheng Zhuting, Huang Qingmei, Zhang Wen, Hu Pengwei, Yuan Changrong, Wu Fulei
School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Health Service Training, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Nurs Open. 2025 Apr;12(4):e70222. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70222.
To identify the group patterns of psychological distress and its predictors among Chinese elderly cancer patients. To examine the effect of profile on patients' Quality of Life (QOL).
This was a cross-sectional study conducted in accordance with the STROBE guidelines.
This study included 357 patients with cancer aged ≥ 60 years. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to analyse psychological distress collected using the Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Short Form 8a and Depression Short Form 8a. Univariate analysis and univariate multinormal logistic regression were used to examine the correlates of latent membership. Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to assess profile differences in self-reported QOL.
The best fit was a three-profile solution: low psychological distress (34.7%), moderate psychological distress (35.6%) and high psychological distress (29.7%). Patients in the moderate psychological profile were more likely to be female, have religious relief, not be in marriage, have financial burden, and be under treatment; they were less likely to be diagnosed with gynaecological cancer and breast cancer. Patients in the high psychological profile were more likely to be older, female, have a high school or above educational background, have religious relief, live in the country, be retired, have no knowledge about the disease, be unaware of tumour metastasis, have no tumour metastasis, be under treatment, and have complications; they were less likely to be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and gynaecological cancer. Different psychological distress profiles were associated with QOL, with the low distress group reporting significantly higher QOL.
Chinese elderly cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria completed the questionnaires.
识别中国老年癌症患者心理困扰的群体模式及其预测因素。研究心理困扰模式对患者生活质量(QOL)的影响。
这是一项按照STROBE指南进行的横断面研究。
本研究纳入了357名年龄≥60岁的癌症患者。采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)对使用患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)焦虑简表8a和抑郁简表8a收集的心理困扰数据进行分析。采用单因素分析和单因素多正态逻辑回归来检验潜在类别归属的相关因素。使用Kruskal-Wallis H检验评估自我报告的生活质量在不同心理困扰模式间的差异。
最佳拟合为三类别模型:低心理困扰(34.7%)、中度心理困扰(35.6%)和高度心理困扰(29.7%)。中度心理困扰模式的患者更可能为女性、有宗教慰藉、未婚、有经济负担且正在接受治疗;他们被诊断为妇科癌症和乳腺癌的可能性较小。高度心理困扰模式的患者更可能年龄较大、为女性、具有高中及以上教育背景、有宗教慰藉、居住在农村、已退休、对疾病不了解、不知道肿瘤转移、无肿瘤转移、正在接受治疗且有并发症;他们被诊断为结直肠癌和妇科癌症的可能性较小。不同的心理困扰模式与生活质量相关,低困扰组报告的生活质量显著更高。
符合纳入标准的中国老年癌症患者完成了问卷调查。