Shen Jing, Zhang Kun, Meng Xiangyin, Yang Bo, Ma Jiabin, Hu Ke, Zhang Fuquan, Hou Xiaorong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, People's Republic of China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251329120. doi: 10.1177/15330338251329120. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
IntroductionBreast radiotherapy is associated with a higher risk of cardiac diseases. Although deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the heart dose, it is underutilized. The selection of proper candidates for DIBH remains an unresolved issue. This study compared dosimetric parameters between free breathing (FB) and DIBH, monitored myocardial enzymes, and aimed to identify factors that can predict cardiac injury thus developing a method to identify proper patients for DIBH.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study, enrolling 58 patients with left-sided breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery. All patients underwent computed tomography scans in both FB and DIBH states. A comparative analysis of dosimetric features between DIBH and FB was conducted. Myocardial enzyme was monitored until six months post-radiation therapy. T-tests were used to assess differences between the DIBH and the FB. Pearson correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with the subclinical acute cardiac injury.ResultsThe mean heart dose (MHD) of the DIBH group significantly dropped as compared to the FB group (3.81 Gy vs 1.65 Gy p = 0.001). Cardiac V40, V30, V25, V10, and V5 volumes also significantly reduced. 9(15.51%) patients exhibited increased myocardial enzyme, with cTnI being the most sensitive indicator. The heart dose was a predictor for the cardiac enzyme's elevation. The ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.6. With an MHD threshold of 2 Gy, both sensitivity and specificity exceeded 0.7.ConclusionDIBH significantly diminishes radiation exposure to the heart and LAD compared with FB. Cardiac enzyme analysis facilitates the early detection of cardiac injury following radiation therapy. An MHD threshold of less than 2 Gy is associated with a reduced risk of subclinical cardiac injury, potentially obviating the need for DIBH, which optimizes clinical efficiency and economic viability.
引言
乳房放射治疗与心脏病风险较高相关。尽管深吸气屏气(DIBH)可降低心脏剂量,但该方法未得到充分利用。选择合适的DIBH候选者仍是一个未解决的问题。本研究比较了自由呼吸(FB)和DIBH之间的剂量学参数,监测了心肌酶,并旨在确定可预测心脏损伤的因素,从而开发一种识别适合DIBH患者的方法。
方法
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入58例保乳手术后的左侧乳腺癌患者。所有患者均在FB和DIBH状态下进行计算机断层扫描。对DIBH和FB之间的剂量学特征进行了比较分析。监测心肌酶直至放疗后六个月。采用t检验评估DIBH和FB之间的差异。进行Pearson相关性分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,以确定与亚临床急性心脏损伤相关的因素。
结果
与FB组相比,DIBH组的平均心脏剂量(MHD)显著下降(3.81 Gy对1.65 Gy,p = 0.001)。心脏V40、V30、V25、V10和V5体积也显著减少。9例(15.51%)患者心肌酶升高,其中肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)是最敏感的指标。心脏剂量是心脏酶升高的预测因子。ROC曲线分析显示曲线下面积为0.6。当MHD阈值为2 Gy时,敏感性和特异性均超过0.7。
结论
与FB相比,DIBH显著减少了心脏和左前降支的辐射暴露。心脏酶分析有助于放疗后心脏损伤的早期检测。MHD阈值小于2 Gy与亚临床心脏损伤风险降低相关,可能无需进行DIBH,从而优化临床效率和经济可行性。