Caussat Thomas, Blair Brian, Oberman Lindsay M
Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Health Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 27;16:1494811. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1494811. eCollection 2025.
High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left-hemisphere dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is FDA cleared for the treatment of adult treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD). Though off-label, sequential bilateral stimulation (SBS), which combines high-frequency left-hemisphere and low-frequency right-hemisphere DLPFC stimulation, is offered in various clinics to treat depression with comorbid anxiety. Few systematic studies investigate the comparative efficacy of the SBS protocol versus the FDA-label protocol for the clinical management of depression with comorbid anxiety. The objective of the current study was to compare the efficacy of HF-LUS to that of SBS within a clinical setting where both are offered to patients with anxious depression. Based on both theories of the pathophysiology of anxious depression as well as clinical practice, we hypothesized that SBS would result in greater symptom reduction as compared to HF-LUS.
This open label, retrospective cohort study included 86 patients with MDD and comorbid anxiety who received either high frequency left unilateral stimulation (HF-LUS) (n=44) or SBS (n=42). Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9), General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD7) questionnaire, a self-reported depression (SRD) Likert scale, and a self-reported anxiety (SRA) Likert scale were used to quantify changes in depressive and anxiety symptoms.
Inconsistent with our hypothesis, both groups saw a significant improvement in depression and anxiety symptoms with no difference in course nor degree of improvement. Improvements in depression and anxiety were significantly positively correlated in both bilateral and unilateral cohorts.
Bilateral rTMS may not provide any additional therapeutic advantages over the standard FDA-cleared left unilateral rTMS protocol for anxious depressive patients.
高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗成人难治性重度抑郁症(MDD)。虽然未获批准,但序贯双侧刺激(SBS),即将高频左侧半球和低频右侧半球DLPFC刺激相结合的方法,在多家诊所用于治疗伴有共病焦虑的抑郁症。很少有系统研究调查SBS方案与FDA批准方案在伴有共病焦虑的抑郁症临床管理中的疗效比较。本研究的目的是在为伴有焦虑性抑郁的患者同时提供这两种治疗方法的临床环境中,比较高频左侧单侧刺激(HF-LUS)和SBS的疗效。基于焦虑性抑郁的病理生理学理论以及临床实践,我们假设与HF-LUS相比,SBS能更大程度地减轻症状。
这项开放标签、回顾性队列研究纳入了86例患有MDD且伴有共病焦虑的患者,他们接受了高频左侧单侧刺激(HF-LUS)(n = 44)或SBS(n = 42)。使用患者健康问卷9(PHQ9)、广泛性焦虑障碍7(GAD7)问卷、自我报告抑郁(SRD)李克特量表和自我报告焦虑(SRA)李克特量表来量化抑郁和焦虑症状的变化。
与我们的假设不一致,两组的抑郁和焦虑症状均有显著改善,改善过程和程度无差异。双侧和单侧队列中抑郁和焦虑的改善均显著正相关。
对于焦虑性抑郁患者,双侧rTMS可能并不比标准的FDA批准的左侧单侧rTMS方案具有任何额外的治疗优势。