Suppr超能文献

腰椎CBT螺钉植入中个性化3D打印导航技术与徒手峡部法的对比研究

Comparative study of individualized 3D-printing navigation technology and free-hand isthmus method in lumbar CBT screw implantation.

作者信息

Hu Hanlin, Lu Zhenghao, Gao Xiaowen, Ou Jun, Wang Jiong

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, China.

Health School of Nuclear Industry, Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 Mar 27;12:1520481. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1520481. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Traditional cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws in the lumbar spine offer greater holding strength and are well-suited for patients with osteoporosis. However, the screw implantation procedure is challenging and associated with significant risk. This study aimed to assess whether individualized 3D-printing navigation technology provides higher accuracy and better clinical outcomes compared to the free-hand isthmus method for lumbar CBT screw implantation.

METHODS

From September 2020 to August 2023, a total of 41 patients who underwent CBT screw surgery were retrospectively collected. Among them, 23 patients underwent the free-hand isthmus method (Group A), while 18 patients underwent the individualized 3D-printing navigation technique (Group B). All imaging and clinical data for these patients were collected in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

During the surgery, 185 CBT screws were implanted into the lumbar spines of 41 patients-78 in Group A and 107 in Group B. After the surgery, the majority of implanted screws (86.5%) were classified as grade 0, indicating satisfactory implantation. Compared to Group A, Group B had fewer screws classified as grade 1 or grade 2 ( = 0.045), indicating higher accuracy in screw implantation. Additionally, Group B also had a shorter operation duration ( = 0.02), fewer fluoroscopy exposures ( < 0.01), and less blood loss ( = 0.03). In addition, compared to Group A, individuals in Group B showed significant improvement in back pain symptoms at both 3 and 6 months ( = 0.01 and <0.01), as well as in physical activity at 3 months ( = 0.02) postoperatively. No significant difference in postoperative complications was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the free-hand isthmus method, lumbar CBT screw implantation with individualized 3D-printing navigation technology shows higher accuracy, shorter operative time, reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy and blood loss, and better clinical outcomes at three months post-surgery.

摘要

目的

腰椎传统皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉具有更高的把持力,适用于骨质疏松患者。然而,螺钉植入操作具有挑战性且风险较大。本研究旨在评估与徒手峡部法相比,个性化3D打印导航技术在腰椎CBT螺钉植入中是否能提供更高的准确性和更好的临床效果。

方法

回顾性收集2020年9月至2023年8月期间接受CBT螺钉手术的41例患者。其中,23例患者采用徒手峡部法(A组),18例患者采用个性化3D打印导航技术(B组)。对这些患者的所有影像学和临床数据进行盲法收集。

结果

手术过程中,41例患者的腰椎共植入185枚CBT螺钉,其中A组78枚,B组107枚。术后,大多数植入螺钉(86.5%)被分类为0级,表明植入情况良好。与A组相比,B组分类为1级或2级的螺钉较少(P = 0.045),表明螺钉植入的准确性更高。此外,B组的手术时间也较短(P = 0.02),透视暴露次数更少(P < 0.01),失血量更少(P = 0.03)。此外,与A组相比,B组患者在术后3个月和6个月时背痛症状均有显著改善(P = 0.01和P < 0.01),术后3个月时身体活动能力也有改善(P = 0.02)。两组术后并发症无显著差异。

结论

与徒手峡部法相比,采用个性化3D打印导航技术进行腰椎CBT螺钉植入具有更高的准确性、更短的手术时间、减少术中透视和失血量,且术后3个月临床效果更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce65/11983563/ca557066f733/fsurg-12-1520481-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验