Shaheen Esraa A, Aljefri Yara E, Ghaddaf Abdullah A, Alshareef Khalid M, Alhindi Abeer K, Alanazi Narin F, Alrashidi Anwar R, Jfri Abdulhadi
College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
JAAD Int. 2024 Jan 13;20:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.12.010. eCollection 2025 Jun.
There are multiple topical agents for papulopustular rosacea (PPR), but the most effective for the management of moderate-to-severe PPR remains unknown.
To compare the efficacy and safety of topical agents for moderate-to-severe PPR.
Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched. The efficacy of topical agents was explored through frequentist network meta-analysis using random-effects model. Treatments were ranked using net rank function, yielding P scores.
Nineteen randomized control trials (RCTs) that enrolled and 8208 participants were deemed eligible. Azelaic acid 20% yielded the highest effect size (OR = 8.54, 95% CI: 2.48-29.45) and highest P-score (P score = 0.97) with respect to improvement in investigator global assessment (IGA) score. Azelaic acid 15%, Metronidazole 0.75%, and Ivermectin 1% yielded comparable effect sizes. Azelaic acid 15% yielded statistically significant odds ratio (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.30-2.93, P score = 0.14) for adverse events. Adverse event risk for other topical agents was not significant.
The sample size was limited for some of the topical agents. Also, many clinically important outcomes were overlooked by most of the included RCTs.
Azelaic acid 20% was the most effective in improving IGA score for moderate-to-severe PPR and azelaic acid 15% as having the highest adverse event profile.
治疗丘疹脓疱型玫瑰痤疮(PPR)有多种局部用药,但中度至重度PPR最有效的治疗方法尚不清楚。
比较治疗中度至重度PPR的局部用药的疗效和安全性。
检索了Medline、Embase和CENTRAL数据库。使用随机效应模型通过频率网络荟萃分析探讨局部用药的疗效。使用净排名函数对治疗进行排名,得出P值。
19项随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准,共8208名参与者。就改善研究者整体评估(IGA)评分而言,20%壬二酸的效应量最高(OR = 8.54,95%CI:2.48 - 29.45)且P值最高(P值 = 0.97)。15%壬二酸、0.75%甲硝唑和1%伊维菌素的效应量相当。15%壬二酸的不良事件优势比具有统计学意义(OR = 1.95,95%CI:1.30 - 2.93,P值 = 0.14)。其他局部用药的不良事件风险不显著。
一些局部用药的样本量有限。此外,大多数纳入的RCT忽略了许多重要的临床结局。
20%壬二酸对改善中度至重度PPR的IGA评分最有效,15%壬二酸的不良事件发生率最高。