Poulsen Melissa N, Nordberg Cara M, DeWalle Joseph, Reeder Meghann, Berrettini Wade, Schwartz Brian S
Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger College of Health Sciences, Danville, PA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02897-1.
To elucidate the role of community socioeconomic conditions in creating opioid-related risk environments, we assessed community-level socioeconomic measures in association with opioid use disorder (OUD) across a diverse geography.
We conducted a case-control study using medical records (2012-2020) from a Pennsylvania health system to identify cases of OUD (n = 14,674) and controls (n = 58,696; frequency-matched on age, sex, year, medical record duration). Residential addresses were used to assign community-level measures: community socioeconomic deprivation (CSD), high proportional housing costs (HPHC), population in service occupations (PSO), and community credit score (CCS). Logistic regression analyzed associations of community type (city census tracts [CCT], boroughs, townships) and community socioeconomic features (stratified by community type) with OUD, adjusting for demographics and individual-level socioeconomic status.
CCT or borough (versus township) residence was associated with higher OUD odds. CSD, HPHC, and CCS were associated with OUD across community types; PSO was only associated in CCTs. The highest (versus lowest) level of CSD was associated (odds ratio, 95% CI) with higher OUD odds among individuals in townships (1.18 [1.03, 1.36]), boroughs (1.34 [1.09, 1.63]), and CCTs (1.46 [1.13, 1.88]). "Good" (versus "high fair") CCS was associated with lower odds in townships (0.78 [0.71, 0.86]), boroughs (0.56 [0.41, 0.77]), and CCTs (0.73 [0.44, 1.22]).
Findings indicate poor community socioeconomic conditions are related to higher OUD risk, highlight the value of research regarding opioid-related risk environments, and suggest structural and policy interventions, such as vocational training and rent subsidies, as important for addressing the root causes of OUD.
为阐明社区社会经济状况在营造阿片类药物相关风险环境中的作用,我们在不同地理区域评估了与阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)相关的社区层面社会经济指标。
我们利用宾夕法尼亚州一个医疗系统的病历(2012 - 2020年)开展了一项病例对照研究,以确定阿片类药物使用障碍病例(n = 14,674)和对照(n = 58,696;按年龄、性别、年份、病历时长进行频率匹配)。居住地址用于确定社区层面的指标:社区社会经济剥夺(CSD)、高比例住房成本(HPHC)、服务行业人口(PSO)和社区信用评分(CCS)。逻辑回归分析了社区类型(城市普查区[CCT]、行政区、镇区)和社区社会经济特征(按社区类型分层)与阿片类药物使用障碍的关联,并对人口统计学和个体层面的社会经济状况进行了调整。
居住在CCT或行政区(相对于镇区)与阿片类药物使用障碍的较高几率相关。CSD、HPHC和CCS在不同社区类型中均与阿片类药物使用障碍相关;PSO仅在CCT中相关。最高(相对于最低)水平的CSD与镇区(优势比,95%置信区间)、行政区(1.34 [1.09, 1.63])和CCT(1.46 [1.13, 1.88])中个体的较高阿片类药物使用障碍几率相关。“良好”(相对于“较高中等”)的CCS与镇区(0.78 [0.71, 0.86])、行政区(0.56 [0.41, 0.77])和CCT(0.73 [0.44, 1.22])中较低的几率相关。
研究结果表明,社区社会经济状况不佳与较高的阿片类药物使用障碍风险相关,凸显了关于阿片类药物相关风险环境研究的价值,并表明职业培训和租金补贴等结构性和政策性干预措施对于解决阿片类药物使用障碍的根本原因很重要。