Ulloa Patricia, Rudolf Justus Christian, Kremer Janina, Schmidt Aileen, Schramm Peter
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Ratzeburger Allee 160 | Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
MAGMA. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s10334-025-01248-0.
Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) along perivascular spaces (ALPS) index have been proposed as noninvasive techniques to indirectly evaluate the glymphatic system function. However, these techniques are sensitive to examination parameters, limiting inter-study comparability. The definition of the region of interest (ROI) has been identified as the primary weakness of the ALPS method. Therefore, we aimed to determine which ROI characteristics would best promote consistent ALPS index analysis.
We examined 13 healthy volunteers using DTI and DWI to calculate the ALPS index, and compared and determined correlations among 11 different ROI configurations, and tested inter-method reliability.
We found significant differences between different ROI configurations in the ALPS index calculation. Considering ROI characteristics and inter-method reliability, a squared ROI is the most suitable. The ICC between ROI configurations showed good-to-excellent inter-method agreement (mean ICC = 0.83). We did not find significant inter-method differences.
It is important to standardize the ROI characteristics for consistent ALPS index calculation.
扩散张量成像(DTI)和沿血管周围间隙的扩散加权成像(DWI)的ALPS指数已被提出作为间接评估类淋巴系统功能的非侵入性技术。然而,这些技术对检查参数敏感,限制了研究间的可比性。感兴趣区域(ROI)的定义已被确定为ALPS方法的主要弱点。因此,我们旨在确定哪些ROI特征最有助于进行一致的ALPS指数分析。
我们使用DTI和DWI对13名健康志愿者进行检查以计算ALPS指数,并比较和确定11种不同ROI配置之间的相关性,并测试方法间的可靠性。
我们发现在ALPS指数计算中不同ROI配置之间存在显著差异。考虑到ROI特征和方法间的可靠性,方形ROI是最合适的。ROI配置之间的组内相关系数显示出良好到极好的方法间一致性(平均组内相关系数=0.83)。我们没有发现显著的方法间差异。
为了进行一致的ALPS指数计算,标准化ROI特征很重要。