Vaithialingam Balaji, Dutta Abinash, Gopal Swaroop
Division of Neuroanaesthesiology and Neurocritical Care, International Institute of Neurosciences, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
, Second floor, Skanda Nivas, Gundappa Gowda Road, Vivek Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560047, India.
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;72(4):644-648. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02942-2. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
A midline aberrant artery is an absolute contraindication to percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). In this case report, we highlight a number of technical modifications that resulted in a successful PDT in a patient with a large midline aberrant artery.
A 72-yr-old woman with a posterior cranial fossa hematoma underwent PDT due to prolonged mechanical ventilation in the neurointensive care unit. On clinical examination, the patient had a huge, pulsatile midline neck mass. Ultrasonography (US) showed an aberrant artery that covered the entire tracheal length and deviated to the right, away from the midline, just below the cricoid cartilage at the level of the first tracheal ring. The patient's family members were counseled, and following provision of informed consent, we planned PDT with technical modifications. After anesthesia induction, we replaced the endotracheal tube with a supraglottic airway device. We performed surface marking with US and chose a higher entry point between the first and second tracheal rings with a left anterolateral approach to the trachea. We made a 1-cm skin incision away from the midline towards the left side to aid with dilatation during the PDT procedure. We punctured the left anterolateral tracheal wall under real-time fibreoptic bronchoscopy and successfully performed PDT using a single-dilatation Ciaglia technique.
This report provides an anecdotal description of successful PDT in a patient with a large midline aberrant artery based on the use of US and a number of technical modifications. Nevertheless, PDT should continue to be considered contraindicated in patients with a midline aberrant artery, in whom surgical tracheostomy is the recommended technique.
正中异常动脉是经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)的绝对禁忌证。在本病例报告中,我们重点介绍了一些技术改进措施,这些措施使得一名患有粗大正中异常动脉的患者成功接受了PDT。
一名72岁患有后颅窝血肿的女性患者,因在神经重症监护病房需要长时间机械通气而接受了PDT。临床检查时,患者颈部正中出现一个巨大的搏动性肿块。超声检查显示一条异常动脉覆盖了整个气管长度,并在环状软骨下方、第一气管环水平偏离中线至右侧。我们向患者家属提供了咨询,并在获得知情同意后,计划对技术进行改进后实施PDT。麻醉诱导后,我们用声门上气道装置取代了气管内导管。我们用超声进行了体表标记,并选择在第一和第二气管环之间较高的穿刺点,采用左前外侧入路进入气管。我们在距中线左侧1 cm处做了一个皮肤切口,以便在PDT操作过程中辅助扩张。我们在实时纤维支气管镜引导下穿刺左前外侧气管壁,并使用单扩张Ciaglia技术成功实施了PDT。
本报告基于超声检查及多项技术改进措施,对一名患有粗大正中异常动脉的患者成功实施PDT进行了经验性描述。尽管如此,正中异常动脉患者仍应继续被视为PDT禁忌证,对于此类患者,推荐采用外科气管切开术。