Li Ke, Burns Bruce R, Cui Shuang, Song Qi, Zhao Chengxi, Zhang Mingtian, Zhang Dan, Liu Bingwan
College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 1;15(7):1017. doi: 10.3390/ani15071017.
Wildlife behavior can be influenced by the deployment of sensory cues in a landscape, but different cues vary in the strength and duration of their effectiveness. We aimed to identify the most effective and cost-efficient countermeasures (sensory cues) to deter wild boar () entry and damage to cornfields in Hunchun, Jilin Province, China. These cornfields have experienced severe damage by wild boars during the critical 30-day period when this crop was ripening. From 2016 to 2021, different countermeasures were applied sequentially seeking to control this damage by using either (1) visual deterrents, i.e., solar blinkers of different colors; (2) auditory deterrents, i.e., playbacks of Amur tiger () calls, wild boar calls, or wolf () calls; (3) tactile deterrents, i.e., electric fencing; (4) olfactory deterrents, i.e., Adult Amur tiger feces; or (5) various combined deterrents. We first evaluated the effectiveness of these broad categories, then performed a detailed analysis of the individual countermeasures to assess their specific deterrence effectiveness and duration. A cost-effective analysis was subsequently performed on the most effective countermeasures to evaluate the best option for practical applications. Across the broad categories of deterrents, the tactile group proved the most effective overall. For individual deterrents, the seven countermeasures showing significantly higher effectiveness than the others tested included the following: (1) 1000 mA red solar blinker (32.25 ± 4.22 days), (2) 1000 mA yellow solar blinker (29.67 ± 4.58 days), (3) 1000 mA green solar blinker (29.58 ± 5.60 days), (4) electric fencing with three wires (29.67 ± 0.58 days), (5) electric fencing with two wires (28.00 ± 2.00 days), (6) Adult Amur tiger calls for 15 s and wild boar calls for 15 s plus a combined 30 s plus a blank recording for 5 min (26.50 ± 2.38 days), and (7) Adult Amur tiger feces and calls (27.34 ± 2.94 days). Except for the Adult Amur tiger feces and calls, each countermeasure would cover most of the period over which control is necessary (30 days). The 1000 mA red solar blinker of achieved the highest repellency per cost ratio (0.31) at 30.29 IUS$/hm but showed reduced effectiveness over time. Although electric fencing with three wires offers longer deterrence, its cost-effectiveness ratio was lower (0.27) due to higher installation and maintenance costs at 319.69 IUS$/hm. The 1000 mA red solar blinker offers a highly cost-effective short-term deterrent, while the electric fencing with three wires provides durable, long-term protection despite its higher costs. Balancing cost and duration can optimize wild boar deterrence strategies across different management needs.
野生动物的行为会受到景观中感官线索布置的影响,但不同线索在有效性的强度和持续时间方面存在差异。我们旨在确定最有效且成本效益高的对策(感官线索),以阻止野猪进入并破坏中国吉林省珲春市的玉米田。在玉米成熟的关键30天期间,这些玉米田遭受了野猪的严重破坏。2016年至2021年,我们依次采用了不同的对策,试图通过以下方式控制这种破坏:(1)视觉威慑物,即不同颜色的太阳能闪烁灯;(2)听觉威慑物,即播放东北虎叫声、野猪叫声或狼叫声;(3)触觉威慑物,即电围栏;(4)嗅觉威慑物,即成年东北虎粪便;(5)各种组合威慑物。我们首先评估了这些大类别的有效性,然后对各个对策进行了详细分析,以评估它们的具体威慑效果和持续时间。随后,对最有效的对策进行了成本效益分析,以评估实际应用的最佳选择。在各类威慑物中,触觉组总体上被证明是最有效的。对于单个威慑物,七种显示出比其他测试对策显著更高有效性的对策如下:(1)1000毫安红色太阳能闪烁灯(32.25±4.22天),(2)1000毫安黄色太阳能闪烁灯(29.67±4.58天),(3)1000毫安绿色太阳能闪烁灯(29.58±5.60天),(4)三根电线的电围栏(29.67±0.58天),(5)两根电线的电围栏(28.00±2.00天),(6)成年东北虎叫15秒、野猪叫15秒加组合30秒加空白录音5分钟(26.50±2.38天),以及(7)成年东北虎粪便和叫声(27.34±2.94天)。除了成年东北虎粪便和叫声外,每种对策都能覆盖大部分需要控制的时期(30天)。1000毫安红色太阳能闪烁灯在30.29美元/公顷的成本下实现了最高的每成本驱避率(0.31),但随着时间推移有效性会降低。尽管三根电线的电围栏提供更长时间的威慑,但其成本效益比更低(0.27),因为在319.69美元/公顷的情况下安装和维护成本更高。1000毫安红色太阳能闪烁灯提供了一种成本效益高的短期威慑,而三根电线的电围栏尽管成本较高,但能提供持久的长期保护。平衡成本和持续时间可以针对不同的管理需求优化野猪威慑策略。