Zhang Hui, Zheng Yunyan, Zhang Mingzhe, Wang Ailing, Song Yang, Wang Chenglong, Yang Guang, Ma Mingping, He Muzhen
Shengli Clinical College of Fujian Medical University & Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shengli Clinical College of Fujian Medical University & Department of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Med Phys. 2025 Jun;52(6):3711-3722. doi: 10.1002/mp.17813. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
Radiomics research based on whole tumors is limited by the unclear biological significance of radiomics features, which therefore lack clinical interpretability.
We aimed to determine whether features extracted from subregions defined by habitat imaging, reflecting tumor heterogeneity, could identify breast cancer patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), to optimize treatment.
143 women with stage II-III breast cancer were divided into a training set (100 patients, 36 with pathologic complete response [pCR]) and a test set (43 patients, 16 with pCR). Patients underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before NAC. With the pathological results as the gold standard, we used the training set to build models for predicting pCR based on whole-tumor radiomics (Model), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-based habitat imaging (Model), conventional MRI features (Model), and immunohistochemical findings (Model). We also built the combined models Model and Model. In the test set, we compared the performance of the combined models with that of the invasive Model by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of the model. The DeLong test was used to compare diagnostic efficiency across different parameters.
In the prediction of pCR, Model, Model, Model, Model, Model, Model and Model achieved AUCs of 0.895, 0.757, 0.705, 0.807, 0.800, 0.856, and 0.891 respectively, in the training set and 0.549, 0.708, 0.700, 0.788, 0.745, 0.909, and 0.891 respectively, in the test set. The DeLong test revealed no significant difference between Model versus Model (p = 0.695) and Model versus Model (p = 0.382) but showed a significant difference between Model and Model (p = 0.043).
The habitat model we established from first-order features combined with conventional MRI features and IHC findings accurately predicted pCR before NAC. This model can facilitate decision-making during individualized treatment for breast cancer.
基于全肿瘤的放射组学研究受到放射组学特征生物学意义不明确的限制,因此缺乏临床可解释性。
我们旨在确定从反映肿瘤异质性的栖息地成像定义的子区域中提取的特征是否能够识别将从新辅助化疗(NAC)中获益的乳腺癌患者,以优化治疗。
143例II-III期乳腺癌女性患者被分为训练集(100例患者,36例达到病理完全缓解[pCR])和测试集(43例患者,16例达到pCR)。患者在接受NAC前接受3-T磁共振成像(MRI)检查。以病理结果作为金标准,我们使用训练集建立基于全肿瘤放射组学预测pCR的模型(模型)、基于体素内不相干运动(IVIM)的栖息地成像模型(模型)、传统MRI特征模型(模型)和免疫组化结果模型(模型)。我们还构建了联合模型模型和模型。在测试集中,我们通过使用受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积和决策曲线分析(DCA)比较联合模型与侵袭性模型的性能。进行受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析以评估模型的预测价值。使用DeLong检验比较不同参数的诊断效率。
在预测pCR方面,模型、模型、模型、模型、模型、模型和模型在训练集中的AUC分别为0.895、0.757、0.705、0.807、0.800、0.856和0.891,在测试集中分别为0.549、0.708、0.700、0.788、0.745、0.909和0.891。DeLong检验显示模型与模型之间(p = 0.695)以及模型与模型之间(p = 0.382)无显著差异,但模型与模型之间存在显著差异(p = 0.043)。
我们从一阶特征结合传统MRI特征和免疫组化结果建立的栖息地模型在NAC前准确预测了pCR。该模型可促进乳腺癌个体化治疗期间的决策制定。