Šereš Michal, Černá Tereza, Hnátková Tereza, Rozkošný Miloš, Grasserová Alena, Semerád Jaroslav, Němcová Kateřina, Cajthaml Tomáš
Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic E-mail:
Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic; Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Water Sci Technol. 2025 Apr;91(7):876-892. doi: 10.2166/wst.2025.042. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
This study evaluates the removal efficiency of 15 estrogenic endocrine-disrupting compounds in two operational constructed wetlands with different designs: a hybrid system (constructed wetland A) and a horizontal system (constructed wetland B). The assessment involved analyzing composite water samples obtained from passive samplers through liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with yeast assays. Additionally, grab samples of sludge and sediment were examined to determine the endocrine-disrupting compound's adsorption efficacy. The application of the full logistic model enabled the discernment and ranking of the chemicals contributing to mixture toxicity. The findings revealed constructed wetland A's superior efficacy in the removal of individual endocrine-disrupting compounds (with an average efficiency of 94%) compared to constructed wetland B (60%). Furthermore, constructed wetland A displayed a higher estimated estrogenic activity removal efficiency (83%) relative to constructed wetland B (52%). Estrogenic activity was adequately accounted for (58-120%) in half of the analyzed samples, highlighting estrone as the primary estrogenic agent. The investigation underscores constructed wetlands' effectiveness in purging endocrine-disrupting compounds, suggesting that their integration as secondary or tertiary treatment systems for such pollutants removal merits further exploration.
本研究评估了两种不同设计的人工湿地(复合系统,即人工湿地A;水平系统,即人工湿地B)对15种雌激素类内分泌干扰化合物的去除效率。评估过程包括通过液相色谱 - 质谱联用酵母分析法分析从被动采样器采集的混合水样。此外,还对抓取的污泥和沉积物样本进行检测,以确定内分泌干扰化合物的吸附效果。全逻辑模型的应用使得能够识别并排列出对混合物毒性有贡献的化学物质。研究结果显示,与人工湿地B(去除效率60%)相比,人工湿地A在去除单个内分泌干扰化合物方面效果更佳(平均效率为94%)。此外,人工湿地A相对于人工湿地B(52%),在估计的雌激素活性去除效率方面更高(83%)。在一半的分析样本中,雌激素活性得到了充分体现(58 - 120%),突出了雌酮作为主要雌激素剂的地位。该调查强调了人工湿地在清除内分泌干扰化合物方面的有效性,表明将其作为去除此类污染物的二级或三级处理系统进行整合值得进一步探索。