Sonoda Kento, Chrusciel Timothy, Bello Jennifer K, Gebauer Sarah C, Grucza Richard, Scherrer Jeffrey F
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
The AHEAD Institute, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, United States.
Fam Pract. 2025 Apr 12;42(3). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf018.
There is limited evidence about whether a substance use disorder (SUD) is a barrier to breast cancer screening. Because SUDs are highly prevalent in the USA, it is important to establish whether this patient population is less likely to obtain screening.
This retrospective cohort study included 220 227 patients, with 209 132 having no SUD and 11 095 (5.0%) with SUD based on electronic health record data in a multi-state, Midwestern healthcare system (1 January 2018-31 December 2022). The outcome was the receipt of a mammogram in the 5-year follow-up period. Patients were women aged 40-69 years as of 1 January 2018, with ≥ 2 in-person primary care visits between 2018 and 2022. Covariates included demographics, health services utilization, and physical/psychiatric conditions.
Mean age of the sample was 54.7 (± 8.3) years old. After controlling for confounding, women without any SUDs had more than twice the odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with stimulant use disorder (odds ratio [OR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-2.33). Women with no SUDs had 89% higher odds of mammogram receipt compared to those with opioid use disorder (OR 1.89; 95% CI: 1.76-2.03), followed by "other" SUDs (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.69-2.06), sedative use (OR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.43-2.04), cannabis use (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.44-1.74), and alcohol use disorders (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.41-1.58).
Despite the high prevalence of SUDs, evidence of preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs is still lacking. Further research is needed to investigate other healthcare disparities in preventive service delivery among individuals with SUDs.
关于物质使用障碍(SUD)是否是乳腺癌筛查的障碍,证据有限。由于物质使用障碍在美国极为普遍,因此确定这一患者群体接受筛查的可能性较低是否属实很重要。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了220227名患者,其中209132名没有物质使用障碍,11095名(5.0%)有物质使用障碍,数据来自一个多州的中西部医疗系统的电子健康记录(2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日)。研究结果是在5年随访期内接受乳房X光检查。患者为截至2018年1月1日年龄在40至69岁之间的女性,在2018年至2022年期间进行了≥2次面对面的初级保健就诊。协变量包括人口统计学、医疗服务利用情况以及身体/精神状况。
样本的平均年龄为54.7(±8.3)岁。在控制混杂因素后,与患有兴奋剂使用障碍的女性相比,没有任何物质使用障碍的女性接受乳房X光检查的几率高出两倍多(优势比[OR]2.06;95%置信区间[CI]:1.83 - 2.33)。与患有阿片类药物使用障碍的女性相比,没有物质使用障碍的女性接受乳房X光检查的几率高出89%(OR 1.89;95% CI:1.76 - 2.03),其次是“其他”物质使用障碍(OR 1.86;95% CI:1.69 - 2.06)、镇静剂使用(OR 1.70;95% CI:1.43 - 2.04)、大麻使用(OR 1.58;95% CI:1.44 - 1.74)和酒精使用障碍(OR 1.49;95% CI:1.41 - 1.58)。
尽管物质使用障碍患病率很高,但仍缺乏关于物质使用障碍患者接受预防服务的证据。需要进一步研究以调查物质使用障碍患者在预防服务提供方面的其他医疗保健差异。