Department of Medicine, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 1;81(10):976-984. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1870.
Community-level social vulnerability (SV) is associated with physical illness and premature mortality. Its association with mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUDs) needs further study.
To study associations of SV with clinical diagnoses of MH disorders, SUDs, and related treatments in the US noninstitutionalized population of adults aged 18 years and older.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A survey of adults in a national sample of US households between October 2020 and October 2022. Participants drawn from a multistage, clustered, and stratified area probability sample of US households were included, excluding adults older than 65 years because of the difficulty of differentiating mental disorders from symptoms of dementia. The sample also included adults living in prisons, state psychiatric hospitals, and homeless shelters who were excluded from the sample of US households used in these analyses. Each sample household was sent a letter explaining the study and offering the option to complete the household roster online, by phone, or by email. Of the 12 906 adults selected for clinical interviewing in the household sample, 4674 completed clinical interviews.
Main outcomes were Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 past-year diagnoses of MH disorders and SUDs and responses to survey questions regarding treatment received. The Social Vulnerability Metric (SVM) and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) were used to determine SV at the residential zip code level.
The analysis involved 4674 participants (2904 [62.13%] female and 1770 [37.87%] male; mean [SD] age, 41.51 [13.41] years). Controlling for measured confounders, the SVM was significantly associated with diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 17.22; 95% CI, 3.05-97.29), opioid use disorder (OUD; aOR, 9.47; 95% CI, 2.30-39.02), stimulant use disorder (aOR, 6.60; 95% CI, 2.01-21.67), bipolar I disorder (aOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.19-4.80), posttraumatic stress disorder (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06-2.50), and any MH disorder (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14-1.83), but not major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or any SUD. Results were similar for the ADI but generally of lower magnitude (SSD aOR, 11.38; 95% CI, 1.61-80.58; OUD aOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 0.30-14.10; stimulant use disorder aOR, 2.18; 95% CI, 0.52-9.18). Among participants with SSDs, SV was associated with reduced MH treatment (aOR, 0.001; 95% CI, 0.00-0.18) and reduced SUD treatment in participants with OUD or stimulant use disorder (aOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.02-2.80).
In contrast to previous studies using nonclinical symptom-based survey data, we found no association between SV and GAD or MDD. By contrast, there were associations of SV with prevalence of SSD, stimulant use disorder, and OUD with corresponding decreases in treatment. These results suggest that the SVM might assist in developing more comprehensive care models that integrate medical and social care for MH disorders and SUDs.
社区层面的社会脆弱性(SV)与身体疾病和过早死亡有关。其与心理健康(MH)和物质使用障碍(SUD)的关联需要进一步研究。
研究 SV 与美国非住院成年人口中 MH 障碍、SUD 及相关治疗的临床诊断之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:对美国家庭全国样本中的成年人进行的一项调查。参与者来自美国家庭的多阶段、聚类和分层区域概率抽样,不包括 65 岁以上的成年人,因为难以将精神障碍与痴呆症状区分开来。该样本还包括居住在监狱、州立精神病院和收容所的成年人,这些人被排除在用于这些分析的美国家庭样本之外。每个抽样家庭都收到一封解释研究的信,并提供在线、电话或电子邮件完成家庭名单的选项。在家庭样本中选择进行临床访谈的 12906 名成年人中,有 4674 人完成了临床访谈。
主要结果是 DSM-5 过去一年 MH 障碍和 SUD 的结构化临床访谈诊断以及对接受治疗的调查问题的答复。使用社会脆弱性指标(SVM)和区域贫困指数(ADI)来确定邮政编码级别的 SV。
该分析涉及 4674 名参与者(2904 名[62.13%]为女性,1770 名[37.87%]为男性;平均[标准差]年龄为 41.51[13.41]岁)。在控制了测量混杂因素后,SVM 与精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD;调整后的优势比[OR],17.22;95%置信区间,3.05-97.29)、阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD;OR,9.47;95%置信区间,2.30-39.02)、兴奋剂使用障碍(OR,6.60;95%置信区间,2.01-21.67)、双相情感障碍 I 型(OR,2.39;95%置信区间,1.19-4.80)、创伤后应激障碍(OR,1.63;95%置信区间,1.06-2.50)和任何 MH 障碍(OR,1.44;95%置信区间,1.14-1.83)显著相关,但与重度抑郁症(MDD)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD)或任何 SUD 无关。ADI 的结果相似,但幅度一般较低(SSD OR,11.38;95%置信区间,1.61-80.58;OUD OR,2.05;95%置信区间,0.30-14.10;兴奋剂使用障碍 OR,2.18;95%置信区间,0.52-9.18)。在 SSD 患者中,SV 与 MH 治疗减少(OR,0.001;95%置信区间,0.00-0.18)和 OUD 或兴奋剂使用障碍患者的 SUD 治疗减少相关(OR,0.24;95%置信区间,0.02-2.80)。
与之前使用非临床症状为基础的调查数据的研究相反,我们发现 SV 与 GAD 或 MDD 之间没有关联。相比之下,SV 与 SSD、兴奋剂使用障碍和 OUD 的患病率存在关联,相应的治疗减少。这些结果表明,SVM 可能有助于制定更全面的护理模式,将医疗和社会护理整合到 MH 障碍和 SUD 中。