文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

作者信息

Ahmed Omar T F, Ahmed Ziyad Tarek, Dairi Abdulrahman W, Zain Al-Abeden Maha Saad, Alkahlot Mohammed H, Alkahlot Rana H, Al Jowf Ghazi I, Eijssen Lars M T, Haider Khawaja Husnain

机构信息

College of Medicine, Sulaiman Alrajhi University, 52726, Al-Bukairiyah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Public Health, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, 31982, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025 Apr 12;16(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04209-5.


DOI:10.1186/s13287-025-04209-5
PMID:40221807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11993956/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the safety and potential efficacy of MSC therapy for heart failure patients. This study delves into mesenchymal stem cells' promising potential, offering a beacon of hope for the future of heart failure treatment with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched four databases and registers for RCTs, including PubMed, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, and other relevant websites. We then selected thirteen RCTs with 1184 participants based on our pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two independent assessors extracted the data and performed a quality assessment. The data were then plotted for various outcomes, including death, hospitalization, major adverse cardiac events, pump function parameters, and 6-min walk distance. RESULTS: The safety of MSC-based treatment has been consistently demonstrated with MSCs from autologous (MSCs) and allogeneic (MSCs) sources. This reassuring finding underscores the reliability of MSC-based therapy irrespective of their source. However, MSCs showed a trend toward greater protective benefits. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between MSCs and MSCs in improving LVEF; 0.86% (95% CI - 1.21-2.94%) for MSCs versus 2.17% (- 0.48%; 95% CI - 1.33-5.67%) for MSCs. MSCs significantly reduced end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by - 2.08 mL (95% CI - 3.52-0.64 mL). Only MSCs significantly improved 6-min walking distance (6-MWD); 31.88 m (95% CI 5.03-58.74 m) for MSCs versus 31.71 m (95% CI - 8.91-71.25 m) for MSCs. The exclusion of studies using adipose-derived cells resulted in even better safety and a significant improvement in LVEF for MSCs treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that MSCs are at par with MSCs in improving functional outcomes in heart failure patients. This underscores the need for future investigations in a larger patient cohort, emphasizing the urgency and importance of further research to fully understand the potential of MSCs in treating heart failure.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/182414e15b74/13287_2025_4209_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/c1f39fb54d1b/13287_2025_4209_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/ead0935ade93/13287_2025_4209_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/5ab298c351ad/13287_2025_4209_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/32bb8846e60f/13287_2025_4209_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/cfcb2f68f14a/13287_2025_4209_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/182414e15b74/13287_2025_4209_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/c1f39fb54d1b/13287_2025_4209_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/ead0935ade93/13287_2025_4209_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/5ab298c351ad/13287_2025_4209_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/32bb8846e60f/13287_2025_4209_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/cfcb2f68f14a/13287_2025_4209_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4899/11993956/182414e15b74/13287_2025_4209_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025-4-12

[2]
Dose-response relationship of MSCs as living Bio-drugs in HFrEF patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024-6-13

[3]
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Therapy for Heart Failure.

Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021

[4]
Efficacy and Safety of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022

[5]
Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac function indices in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Transl Med. 2024-8-22

[6]
Randomized Comparison of Allogeneic Versus Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: POSEIDON-DCM Trial.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017-2-7

[7]
Comparative effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell versus bone-marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024-7-6

[8]
Autologous cells derived from different sources and administered using different regimens for 'no-option' critical lower limb ischaemia patients.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-29

[9]
Comparison of allogeneic vs autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells delivered by transendocardial injection in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: the POSEIDON randomized trial.

JAMA. 2012-12-12

[10]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Tissue-source effect on mesenchymal stem cells as living biodrugs for heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

World J Cardiol. 2024-8-26

[2]
Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac function indices in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Transl Med. 2024-8-22

[3]
Dose-response relationship of MSCs as living Bio-drugs in HFrEF patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024-6-13

[4]
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.

Circulation. 2024-2-20

[5]
The heterogeneity of mesenchymal stem cells: an important issue to be addressed in cell therapy.

Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023-12-20

[6]
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for a Better Prognosis of Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Cureus. 2023-8-6

[7]
Anti-VEGF combined with ocular corticosteroids therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy for diabetic macular edema focusing on drugs injection times and confounding factors of pseudophakic eyes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pharmacol Res. 2023-10

[8]
In Search of the Holy Grail: Stem Cell Therapy as a Novel Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Int J Mol Sci. 2023-3-3

[9]
Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Heart Failure Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Heart Lung Circ. 2023-7

[10]
Randomized Trial of Targeted Transendocardial Mesenchymal Precursor Cell Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023-3-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索