Ahmed Omar T F, Ahmed Ziyad Tarek, Dairi Abdulrahman W, Zain Al-Abeden Maha Saad, Alkahlot Mohammed H, Alkahlot Rana H, Al Jowf Ghazi I, Eijssen Lars M T, Haider Khawaja Husnain
College of Medicine, Sulaiman Alrajhi University, 52726, Al-Bukairiyah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Public Health, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, 31982, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025 Apr 12;16(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04209-5.
BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the safety and potential efficacy of MSC therapy for heart failure patients. This study delves into mesenchymal stem cells' promising potential, offering a beacon of hope for the future of heart failure treatment with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched four databases and registers for RCTs, including PubMed, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, and other relevant websites. We then selected thirteen RCTs with 1184 participants based on our pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two independent assessors extracted the data and performed a quality assessment. The data were then plotted for various outcomes, including death, hospitalization, major adverse cardiac events, pump function parameters, and 6-min walk distance. RESULTS: The safety of MSC-based treatment has been consistently demonstrated with MSCs from autologous (MSCs) and allogeneic (MSCs) sources. This reassuring finding underscores the reliability of MSC-based therapy irrespective of their source. However, MSCs showed a trend toward greater protective benefits. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between MSCs and MSCs in improving LVEF; 0.86% (95% CI - 1.21-2.94%) for MSCs versus 2.17% (- 0.48%; 95% CI - 1.33-5.67%) for MSCs. MSCs significantly reduced end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by - 2.08 mL (95% CI - 3.52-0.64 mL). Only MSCs significantly improved 6-min walking distance (6-MWD); 31.88 m (95% CI 5.03-58.74 m) for MSCs versus 31.71 m (95% CI - 8.91-71.25 m) for MSCs. The exclusion of studies using adipose-derived cells resulted in even better safety and a significant improvement in LVEF for MSCs treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that MSCs are at par with MSCs in improving functional outcomes in heart failure patients. This underscores the need for future investigations in a larger patient cohort, emphasizing the urgency and importance of further research to fully understand the potential of MSCs in treating heart failure.
Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023-12-20